Jatauli, Tehsil Basawa, Distt. Dausa v. Gokul Son Of

Judgment

1. Gokul Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal, Resident Of Jagsoli, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

2. Kamlesh Son Of Shri Laxman, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

3. Kamod Son Of Shri Ramjilal, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

Kali Devi Wife Of Shri Ramjilal, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

5. Gopal Son Of Shri Phulya, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

6. Devkaran Son Of Shri Raghunath, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

7. Prakash Son Of Shri Raghunath, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

8. Puranmal Son Of Shri Daulya, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

9. Muthresh Son Of Shri Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

10. Murari Son Of Shri Ramsahai, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

11. Raghuveer Son Of Shri Ramjilal, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

12. Rambu Son Of Shri Mangla, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

13. Rajanti Devi Wife Of Shri Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

14. Ramjeevan Son Of Shri Daulya, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

15. Ramniwas Son Of Shri Phulya, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa. [2025:RJ-JP:32586] (2 of 5) [CW-3906/2024]

16. Ramswaroop Son Of Shri Phulya, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

17. Lekhraj Son Of Shri Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

18. Sangram Son Of Shri Laxman, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

19. Hemraj Son Of Shri Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

20. Harpyari Devi Wife Of Shri Rambu, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

21. Lali Daughter Of Shri Raghunath, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

22. Govindi Devi Wife Of Shri Laxman, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

23. Karodi Son Of Shri Kanchan, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

24. Kamla Daughter Of Shri Raghunath, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

25. Ghamandi Lal Son Of Shri Kishan Lal, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

26. Ghamsi Daughter Of Shri Kishan Lal, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

27. Pooja Daughter Of Shri Ramkhiladi, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

28. Prakash Son Of Shri Prabhu, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

29. Rajjo Bai Daughter Of Shri Raghunath, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

30. Rajanti Devi Daughter Of Shri Ramvilas, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

31. Ramkishan Son Of Shri Baluram, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

32. Lalaram Son Of Shri Kishanlal, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

33. Sugani Devi Wife Of Shri Kishan Lal, Resident Of Katarwada, Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

34. Ajeet Son Of Shri Kishan Lal, Resident Of Katarwada, [2025:RJ-JP:32586] (3 of 5) [CW-3906/2024] Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa.

35. The Sub-Registrar, Tehsil Gudakatla, Distt. Dausa.

36. State Of Rajasthan, Through Landholder Tehsildar, Tehsil Basawa, Distt. Dausa.

37. The Manager, Uco Bank, Bandikui Branch.

38. The Manager, Uco Bank, Baswa Branch.

39. The Manager, Canara Bank, Bandikui Branch

40. The Manager, Sbi Bank, Bandikui ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Shashi Kant Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr.Bhoop Singh Gurjar with Mr.Jitendra Choudhary Mr.Amit Singh Shekhawat Mr.Umesh Choudhary for Mr.V.D. Gathala, Addl.GC. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 19/08/2025

1. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been made to the impugned order dated 22.12.2023 passed by the Board of Revenue (for short, “the Board”) by which the order dated

18.09.2023 passed by the SDO has been quashed and set-aside ex-parte.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application submitted by the petitioner was allowed by the SDO vide order dated 18.09.2023 against which a revision petition was submitted by the respondents before the Board and the same has been allowed vide impugned order dated 22.12.2023, without even issuing any notice and without affording any opportunity of hearing. Counsel submits that the aforesaid order has been [2025:RJ-JP:32586] (4 of 5) [CW-3906/2024] passed in utter violation of the principle of natural justice, hence, the same is not sustainable in the eye of law and the same is liable to be quashed and set-aside, hence, interference of this Court is warranted.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner, but he is not in a position to controvert the submission made by counsel for the petitioner.

4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.

5. Perusal of the record indicates that the order dated

18.09.2023 has been passed by the SDO, after hearing both the sides, which was assailed by the respondents by way of filing the revision petition, before the Board and the Board vide its impugned order dated 22.12.2023 has not only allowed the revision petition, but also quashed and set-aside the order dated

18.09.2023 passed by the SDO, before passing the aforesaid order, neither any notice nor any opportunity of hearing was provided to the petitioner, which has resulted in utter violation of principle of natural justice.

6. It is settled proposition of law that before passing any adverse order against a person, opportunity of hearing is required to be given to such person, however, in the instant case, no such opportunity was granted to the petitioner.

7. On this count alone, the impugned order dated 22.12.2023 passed by the respondents is not sustainable in the eye of law and is liable to be and is hereby quashed and set-aside. The instant writ petition stands allowed. The matter is remitted to the Board [2025:RJ-JP:32586] (5 of 5) [CW-3906/2024] for fresh disposal of the revision petition submitted by the respondents.

8. The parties are directed to appear before the Board on

15.09.2025.

9. It is expected from the Board to decide the revision petition afresh, after providing due opportunity of hearing to both the sides.

10. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Aayush Sharma /93 (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J