Roshan Khan v. State of Raj. DATE OF ORDER

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. KOTHARI Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, for accused-appellant Mr. Laxman Meena, P.P. for the State *** Heard learned counsel for appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the material available on record. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the accused-appellant was on bail during trial and he has not misused the liberty granted to him. Counsel further submits that final hearing of the appeal is likely to take its own time, hence, sentence awarded to the accused- appellant be suspended during pendency of the appeal. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application for suspension of sentence. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the judgment rendered by the court below, this Court is of the opinion that sentence deserves to be suspended in the instant case. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant namely; Roshan [2] Khan S/o Shri Juhardeen in Session Case No.01/2011 shall remain suspended and he be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of the sum of Rs.40,000/- [Rupees Forty thousand only] with two surety bonds of sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 17.07.2012 and as and when called upon to do so during pendency of the appeal. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence stands disposed of. [S.S. KOTHARI], J. FRBOHRA/376SOSAPPL2012 17-05.doc Certificate: “All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” FATEH RAJ BOHRA, P.A.