Mahavidhaya Govindgarh, Alwar v. State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of

Dr. Mamta Yadav D/o Shri Kartar Singh, Aged About 31 Years, Vill. Tatarpur Post Office Sheetal, Tehasil- Tapukara District. Khairathal- Tijara, (Raj) Working As Assistant Professor (Hindi Literature) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambhal Yojana At Baba Mohanram Kishan Govt. College, Bhiwadi (Khairathal- Tijara)

3. Monika Yadav D/o Shri Hosiyaar Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 252, Harijan Basti, Nasopur, Alwar (Raj.) Working As Assistant Professor (Home Science) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambhal Yojana At Baba Mohanram Kishan Govt. College, Bhiwadi (Khairathal- Tijara)

4. Smt. Rajkumari Arya D/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Arya, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Tapukara, Bhiwadi District- Khairathal- Tijara (Raj.), working As Assistant Professor (Sociology) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambhal Yojana At Rajakiya Kanya Mahavidhaya, Bhiwadi (Khairathal- Tijara)

5. Ms. Manisha Kumara D/o Shri Ram Chander, Aged About 36 Years, R/o D Block, Vikas Nagar (Maheswari) Dharuhera, Rewari (Haryana), Working As Assistant Professor (Political Science) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambhal Yojana At Rajakiya Kanya Mahavidhaya, Bhiwadi (Khairathal- Tijara)

6. Vikram Singh Yadav S/o Shri Jhamman Lal Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 125, C.C. Road, Dhania, Mosampur, Alwar (Raj.) Working As Assistant Professor (History ) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambhal Yojana At Rajakiya Kanya Mahavidhaya, Bhiwadi (Khairathal- Tijara)

7. Arvind Kumar S/o Rajendra Prasad, Aged About 29 Years, Village Dawani, Alwar (Raj.) Working As Assistant Professor (Geography) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambhal Yojana At Rajakiya Kanya Mahavidhaya, Bhiwadi (Khairathal- Tijara) [2025:RJ-JP:9994] (2 of 4) [CW-2743/2025]

8. Rajan Kumar S/o Kishor Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, Pashu Aushadhalya Ke Pass, Naugawan, Alwar (Raj.) Working As Assistant Professor (History) Guest Faculty Under Vidhya Sambhal Yojana At Rajakiya Mahavidhaya, Mubarikpur, Alwar Through Nodal College Rajakiya Mahavidhaya Govindgarh, Alwar ----Petitioners Versus

1. State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Commissioner, College Education, Block 4, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur Rajasthan.

3. The Principal Baba Mohanram Kishan Govt. College, Bhiwadi (Khairathal- Tijara) Through Nodal College Govt. P.G. College Tijara.

4. The Principal, Rajakiya Kanya Mahavidhaya, Bhiwadi (Khairathal- Tijara)

5. The Principal, Rajakiya Mahavidhaya, Mubarikpur Bhiwadi (Khairathal- Tijara) Through Nodal College Rajakiya Mahavidhaya Govindgarh, Alwar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ashvini Raj Tanwar with Mr.Dikshant Jain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 06/03/2025

1. The instant petition has been preferred with the following prayer:- “I. Respondents may kindly be directed to give preference to the petitioner in appointment under Vidhya Sambal Yojana for academic session 2024-2025 in government colleges where petitioner submitted their application forms in pursuance of advertisement issued by these colleges for appointment on the post of college lecturer under Vidya Sambal Yojna for academic session 2024-2025; [2025:RJ-JP:9994] (3 of 4) [CW-2743/2025] Respondents may be restrained from II. terminating services of the petitioner so that the petitioner are not replaced and they may continue in service in terms of various interim orders passed by this Hon’ble Court. III. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.”

2. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made to continue the petitioners as guest faculty under the Vidhya Sambal Yojna and not to replace them from another set of contractual employees in pursuance of the advertisement issued in the year

3. During the course of arguments, it is apprised to this Court that the similar controversy involved in this petition, came before this Court in the case of “Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1474/2023) and the said controversy has been set at rest with the following directions:- “(i) Respondents while engaging the Guest Faculty in the session 2023-24 in various colleges/universities under the Raj-CES under Vidya Sambal Scheme, shall give preference to engage the petitioners who have already rendered services as Guest Faculty in this scheme in the previous sessions/years, at previous place of posting or nearby place obviously subject to availability of vacancies in the previous college/university or nearby place as well as after considering the satisfactory services of petitioners. (ii) Petitioners who have been engaged as Guest Faculty in the previous sessions shall not be dislodged/replaced from its previous place with fresh appointment of Guest Faculty, subject to availability of vacant post and need of engagement. (iii) After re-engagement/adjustment of the petitioners i.e. previous Guest Faculty in the Vidya [2025:RJ-JP:9994] (4 of 4) [CW-2743/2025] Sambal Scheme, against vacancies for the year 2023-24, the remaining vacant posts of previous years, and on the new vacancies accrued in session 2023-24 may be filled by the fresh aspirants in accordance with the criteria of selection prescribed in the scheme. (iv) It is made clear that petitioners who were already engaged in the previous sessions and are willing for appointment/engagement in the present session 2023-24 in the Vidya Sambal Scheme, are required to apply afresh pursuant to advertisement issued by respondents and his/her re- engagement in the Vidya Sambal Scheme for session 2023-24 would be governed by terms and conditions of the scheme and shall not create any additional equity/claim which is not available in the scheme.”

4. In the aforesaid case of Ram Chaturvedi (supra), the Coordinate Bench of this Court has issued directions to the respondents to give preference to engage the co-petitioners, who have already rendered services as Guest Faculty in this scheme in the previous sessions/years.

5. Since the controversy involved in this petition has already been set at rest in the case of Ram Chaturvedi (supra), this Court finds no valid reason to take different view.

6. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with the expectation from the respondents to give preference to the petitioners at the time of process of appointment in pursuance of the advertisement issued in the year 2025.

7. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. Aayush Sharma/19 (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J