✦ Rajasthan High Court · 16 Mar 2026

Joyal v. The State Of Rajasthan

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners - (i) Joyal S/o Aasam, (ii) Sabir S/o Aazad & (iii) Wajid S/o Aazad shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

Judgment

: Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Aarif Mohammed For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG Mr. Kailash Chand Bishnoi, IG, Bharatpur Mr. Sharan, S.P., Deeg Mr. Maneesh Sharma, SHO, Gopalgarh Mr. Bharat Singh, SHO, Kaman HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 16/03/2026

#1. This second bail application has been filed by the petitioners Joyal S/o Aasam, Sabir S/o Aazad & Wajid S/o Aazad, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR No.151/2025 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section [2026:RJ-JP:10964] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-2805/2026] 66-D of the Information Technology Act. The bail application of the petitioners was rejected by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge Kaman, District Deeg by order dated 09.02.2026.

#2. Learned counsel submitted that the first bail application was withdrawn by the petitioners vide order dated 17.12.2025 with liberty to file a fresh bail application after filing of the charge- sheet, thereafter, the petitioners have preferred this second bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S..

#3. Learned counsel submitted that the Police after completing the investigation filed the charge-sheet and no recovery is required to be made. Learned counsel further submitted that the allegations levelled against them are petty in nature as they used SIM and ATM Cards etc. including Mobile Phones of the other persons in the alleged offence. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the accused-petitioners be enlarged on bail.

#4. Mr. Kailash Chand Bishnoi, IG Bharatpur, Mr. Sharan, S.P., Deeg, Mr. Maneesh Sharma, SHO, Gopalgarh & Mr. Bharat Singh, SHO, Kaman present in person before the Court in terms of the order dated 23.02.2026.

#5. Learned Public Prosecutor and the IO present in person strongly opposed the bail application and informed this Court about the conduct of the accused-petitioners, which reflect that one and two complaints were registered against them on 1930 Portal, however, no serious financial transactions were involved.

#6. This Court after considering the charge-sheet, nature of allegations as reported in the FIR, petitioners are behind the bar since long, the overall facts and circumstances and without commenting upon merits of the matter, is inclined to exercise its [2026:RJ-JP:10964] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-2805/2026] power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners Joyal S/o Aasam, Sabir S/o Aazad & Wajid S/o Aazad, on bail.

#7. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners - (i) Joyal S/o Aasam, (ii) Sabir S/o Aazad & (iii) Wajid S/o Aazad shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

#1. Each of the accused-petitioners shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs 50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

#2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused-peti- tioners shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: - (i) Movable and immovable assets which includes land, build- ings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioners have in their name. (ii) The accused-petitioners shall submit complete transaction statements of all of their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO.

#3. The accused shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer.

#4. The accused-petitioners shall surrender his passport, if they have, before the trial Court immediately after being released on [2026:RJ-JP:10964] (4 of 5) [CRLMB-2805/2026] bail. The accused-petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court.

#5. The accused-petitioners shall not use any Virtual Private Net- work (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without per- mission of IO.

#6. The accused-petitioners shall submit to the Investigation Of- ficer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their posses- sion, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order.

#7. The accused-petitioners shall provide to the Investigating Of- ficer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners.

#8. The accused-petitioners shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website with- out the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer.

#9. The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investi- gating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

#10. In case of any change of residential address, the accused-pe- titioners shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

#11. The accused-petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation. [2026:RJ-JP:10964] (5 of 5) [CRLMB-2805/2026]

#12. The accused-petitioners shall not tamper with evidence, in- fluence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further if the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. Monika/61 (RAVI CHIRANIA),J

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 61(2)(a), 303(2), 308(2), 317(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2); Information Technology Act, 2000; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Rajasthan High Court, on 16 Mar 2026. The bench was RAVI CHIRANIA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BAIL APPLICATION No. 2805 of 2026). ← Search more judgments