BENCH AT JAIPUR v. Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2578/2026

Judgment

2. Sahadat S/o Harun, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Cheela, Po- lice Station Tawdu, District Nuh (Haryana) At Present Res- ident Of Village Kundan Nagla, Police Station Jurhera, Dis- trict Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Deeg). Munfed S/o Hakku, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Ganwadi, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Deeg). State Of Rajasthan, Through PP Versus ----Petitioners ----Respondent For Petitioner(s)

: Mr. Arafat Hussain Mr. D.K. Dixit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 16/03/2026

1. The instant bail applications have been filed by the petitioners -Arwaz S/o Din Mohammad, Rohil Khan S/o Samaydin, Sahadat S/o Harun and Munfed S/o Hakku, aged about 18 Years, [2026:RJ-JP:11003] (2 of 5) [CRLMB-2418/2026] 18 years, 21 years and 21 years respectively, arrested in connection with FIR No.23/2026, dated 11.01.2026 Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, for the offences under Sections 319 (2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313, 61 (2) (a) B.N.S, 2023 and Section 66D of I.T. Act, 2008.

2. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 14.01.2026. They have not committed any serious offence and no serious financial transaction is reflected as per the contents of impugned FIR. He further submits that the investigation has already been made and no recovery is required to be effected from the petitioners. He also submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents of any nature. Therefore, he prayed that the accused petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications and submits on the basis of case diary that the petitioners are misusing the digital IDs on the basis of which they have committed cyber crimes. However, he fails to inform this Court regarding the complaints registered against them on 1930.

4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, the fact that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents of any nature and nothing has been recovered from them during the course of investigation, and without commenting upon the merits or demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused-petitioners.

5. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Arwaz S/o Din Mohammad, Rohil Khan S/o Samaydin, [2026:RJ-JP:11003] (3 of 5) [CRLMB-2418/2026] Sahadat S/o Harun and Munfed S/o Hakku shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

1. Each of the accused-petitioners shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs 50,000 each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

2. Within 15 days from the date of this order, the accused- petitioners shall file an affidavit before the trial Court/ I.O. disclosing the following details: - (i) Moveable and immovable assets which includes land, buildings, vehicles, deposits, investments all bank accounts and digital wallets, UPI IDs cryptocurrency holdings etc. allegedly used in commission of the offence or which the accused-petitioners have in their name. (ii) The accused-petitioners shall submit complete transaction statements of all their active bank accounts, UPI IDs and digital payment instruments etc. after every 30 days till completion of the trial to the IO.

3. The accused shall not obtain/use any new SIM card, mobile phone or open new bank account etc. without the prior intimation to the Investigating Officer.

4. The accused-petitioners shall surrender his passport, if they have, before the trial Court immediately after being released on bail. The accused-petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the trial Court.

5. The accused-petitioners shall not use any Virtual Private Network (VPN), TOR Browser, Proxy Server or any other form of anonymous network or identity masking technology without permission of IO. [2026:RJ-JP:11003] (4 of 5) [CRLMB-2418/2026]

6. The accused-petitioners shall submit to the Investigation Officer a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in their possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within 15 days of release under this bail order.

7. The accused-petitioners shall provide to the Investigating Officer details of all social media accounts, e-mail accounts, domain registration, websites and online platforms operated or used by the accused-petitioners.

8. The accused-petitioners shall not create any social media account in the name of any person, domain name or website without the prior intimation to the Investigation Officer.

9. The accused-petitioners shall mark their presence before the concerned police station once in 15 days as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

10. In case of any change of residential address, the accused- petitioners shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

11. The accused-petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called upon and shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

12. The accused-petitioners shall not tamper with evidence, influence witnesses or attempt to obstruct the investigation in any manner whatsoever. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, failure to provide above information or such other information as desired by IO, shall be treated as a violation of the bail conditions, & further [2026:RJ-JP:11003] (5 of 5) [CRLMB-2418/2026] if the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in similar such cases within three years from the date of passing of this order, the public prosecutor shall move an application for cancellation of bail. PAYAL DHAWAN /51-52 (RAVI CHIRANIA),J