✦ Rajasthan High Court

Judgment · High Court

K S RATHORE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Remanded

hereby quashed and set-aside and the matter is remanded

Judgment

Operative part

HON'BLE MR. K.S. RATHORE, J. Mr. Rajendra Prasad for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Sharma for the respondent. **** The present criminal revision petition under Section 397 r/w Section 401 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 20.09.2006 passed by Special Judge (NDPS) Cases, Jaipur in Sessions Case No. 34/2005, whereby the learned Special Judge has framed charges against the petitioner under Sections 8/22 and 8/29 of the NDPS Act. I have heard rival submissions of the respective parties and have also gone through the impugned order dated 20.09.2006 as well as the relevant record. As per Schedule-I appended to the NDPS Rules, the medicines which have been seized do not not fall in the category of NDPS, which has not been considered by the trial Court. [2] Therefore, the impugned order dated 20.09.2006 passed by the Special Judge (NDPS) Cases, Jaipur deserves to be quashed and set-aside and the same is hereby quashed and set-aside and the matter is remanded back to the trial Court for fresh adjudication after giving due consideration to the Schedule-1 appended to the NDPS Rules and considering all the legal and just objections/submissions raised by the respective parties shall pass fresh order in accordance with the provisions of law. With these observations, the revision petition stands disposed of. Record be sent back forthwith. /KKC/ (K.S. RATHORE),J.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: hereby quashed and set-aside and the matter is remanded

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 401; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — ss. 8, 22, 29.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments