Jai Prakash Yadav v. Amar Singh Yadav
Case at a glance
- Bench
- NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Provisions considered
Judgment
Amar Singh Yadav Son Of Suwalal, Resident Of Dilpura, Tehsil Patan District Neemkathana.
Ramdhan Chahar Son Of Ghasiram Chahar, Resident Of Dhani Machhawali Tan Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Harphool Chahar Son Of Arjun Chahar, Resident Of Dhani Machhawali Tan Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Ramswaroop Son Of Bheenwa Chahar, Resident Of Dhani Machhawali Tan Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Subhash Chahar Son Of Bhambhu Ram, Resident Of Dhani Fatehsingh Wali Tan Sirohi, Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Maniram Chahar Son Of Harchand Chahar, Resident Of Dhani Udawali Tan Sirohi, Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Ramniwas Chahar Son Of Harchand Chahar, Resident Of Dhani Udawali Tan Sirohi, Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Kuldaram Yadav Son Of Maliram, Resident Of Dhani Jatwala Tan Sirohi, Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Hariram Yadav Son Of Nathuram, Resident Of Nijhhar Dham, Village Panchayat Aagwadi, Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Kumbharam Leel Son Of Rameshwar Lal, Resident Of Uparlawas, Sirohi, Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Sultan Bichhawalia Son Of Banshiram, Resident Of Dhani Jagrupawali Tan Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathan.
Suvalal Bichhawalia Son Of Banshiram, Resident Of Jagrupawali Tan Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathana. (2 of 4) [CFA-297/2025]
Kajodmal Son Of Ladu Ram, Resident Of Dhani Sirsawala Uparlawas Sirohi, Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Mahipal Badsara Son Of Harlal, Resident Of Dhani Katukaryawali, Tan Papada Tehsil Udaipurwati District Neemkathana.
Dhukalram Yadav Son Of Chokharam, Resident Of Dhani Kheswali Tan Chhapoli Tehsil Udaipurwati.
Ramswaroop Sevag Son Shivsahaya, Resident Of Dhani Sevagawali Tan Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Suvalal Sevag Son Of Surjaram, Resident Of Dhani Devagawali Tan Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Rajesh Jat Son Of Suvalal Resident Of Dhani Sevgawali, Tan Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Mahipal Sevag Son Of Richpal, Resident Of Dhani Sevagawali Tan Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Banshi Lil Son Of Kishore, Resident Of Uparlawas Sirohi Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Kailash Son Of Jagdish, Resident Of Naya Kua Post Tetarwalo Ka Bas, Tehsil And District Neemkathana.
Bahadurmal Son Of Rudharam, Resident Of Dhani Navoda, Tan Keroth Tehsil Udaipurwati District Neemkathana.
Sardarmal Son Of Rudharam, Resident Of Dhani Navoda, Tan Keroth, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Neemkathana.
Bholuraam Son Of Rugharam, Resident Of Dhani Navoda. Tan Keroth Tehsil Udaipurwati District Neemkathana.
Jaiprakash Son Of Prabhuram, Resident Of Dhani Navoda, Tan Keroth Tehsil Udaipurwati District Neemkathana.
Phoolchand Son Of Makhanram, Resident Of Dhani Navoda, Tan Keroth, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Neemkathana.
Mahrndra Son Of Mansharam, Resident Of Dhani Navoda, Tan Keroth, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Neemkathana.
Rohitash Son Of Mansharam, Resident Of Dhani Navoda, Tan Keroth, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Neemkathana.
Sultan Son Of Bhura Ram, And Resident Of Dhani Navoda, Tan Keroth, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Neemkathana. (3 of 4) [CFA-297/2025]
Hardayal Son Of Lunaram, Resident Of Dhani Navoda Tan Keroth Tehsil Udaipurwati District Neemkathana.
Jhabar Son Of Jagdish Prasad, Resident Of Dhani Navoda, Tan Keroth, Tehsil, Udaipurwati, District Neemkathana.
Hardayal Son Of Suganram, Resident Of Mahalaxmi Kante Ke Peeche, Industrial Area Neemkathana.
Dayaram Badsara Son Of Dhudaram Badsara, Resident Of Dhani Badsaro Ki, Post Papada Tehsil Udaipurwati District Neemkathana. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) For Respondent(s) : :
Mr. Ajay Gupta, Adv. & Ms. Sampati Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA 12/03/2025 Order The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant- applicant(for short ‘the applicant’) under Section 96 CPC against the order dated 17.12.2024 passed by the District Judge, Jhunjhunu (for short ‘the trial court’) in Civil Miscellaneous Application No.72/2024 titled as “Jai Prakash Vs. Amar Singh & Anr.”, by which the trial court dismissed the application filed by the applicant under Section 7 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 is still in existence. The trial court while deciding the issue of maintainability, considered the Mental Health Act, 1987. There was no occasion to apply the Mental Health Act, 1987 in the present matter. So, the order dated 17.12.2024 passed by the trial court be set-aside and the matter be remanded (4 of 4) [CFA-297/2025] to the trial court to proceed further in the matter after reserving issue of maintainability of the application. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the impugned order dated 17.12.2024. When Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 is still in existence, the trial court committed error in deciding the issue of maintainability of the application while applying the Mental Health Act, 1987. So, the appeal filed by the applicant is allowed and the order dated
17.12.2024 passed by the trial court is set-aside. The trial court is directed to proceed further in the matter after reserving the issue of the maintainability of the application and after issuing summons to the opposite party. The applicant is directed to appear before the trial court on
01.04.2025. Gourav/224 (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.