✦ High Court of India · 29 Apr 2025

Bhusawar, District Bharatpur Rajasthan vs Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Government

Case Details High Court of India · 29 Apr 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
29 Apr 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,722 words

Khemji Katara, S/o Shri Narsingh Katara, Mukam Post Kasar Vadi, Tehsil Sajjangarh, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

11. Mansingh Maida S/o Bhuraji Maida, Mu. Munipada, Post Timada Bada, Tehsil Kushalgarh, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

15. Dayal Katara S/o Innocent Katara, Aged About 40 Years, Mu. Jharva Pal, Post Jharva Kalan, Tehsil Gangad Talai, District Banswara, Rajasthan. Devi Lal Damor S/o Champa Lal Ji Damor, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Mu Sarankhas, Post Dungar, Tehsil Chikli, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan. Jai Kishan Khilery, S/o Kanaram Khilery, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village And Post Pur, Tehsil Sanchor, District Jalor, Rajasthan. Genaram S/o Tejaram Kumhar, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village And Post Keria, Tehsil Chittalwana, District Jalor, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:18019] (2 of 6) [CW-2420/2020]

27. Rakesh Kumar Dhakad S/o Kuralal Dhakad, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Post Beejwad, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk, Rajasthan. Ram Karan S/o Shri Prabhu Sharan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Markhi, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Shri Phool Chand Jat, Shri Kana Ram Jat, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Bugaliya, Tehsil Aamer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Prahlad Singh S/o Rambhanwar Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Khatipura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. Hawa Singh Yadav S/o Chander Ram Yadav, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Behram Ka Bas, Post Rampur, Tehsil Bansur, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Guman Singh Deshwal S/o Mewa Ram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village And Post Pili, Via Sarsana, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan Satish Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Subash Chandra Yadav, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Kathuvas, Teshil Neemrana, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Ram Naresh Meena, S/o Shri Narayan Meena, R/o Village And Post Ranoli, Tehsil Todabheem , District Karuli, Rajasthan. Laxmi Narayan Meena S/o Shri Ramji Lal Meena, R/o Village And Post Kothdi, Tehsil Hindoun City, District Karuli, Rajasthan. Raju Lal Sharma S/o Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, R/o Village And Post Visaniya, Tehsil Kothdi, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Amrit Lal Meena S/o Shri Laxman Meena, R/o Village And Post Kagdar Bhatiya, Tehsil Rishabdeo, District Udaipur Rajasthan. Jitendar Kumar Sain S/o Shri Dwarka Lal Sain, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village And Post Bada Via Bohat, Tehsil And District Baran, Rajasthan

28. Mukesh Chandra Kabra S/o Shri Ram Kunwar Kabra, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Mu And Post Amargarh, Tehsil Jhajpur, District Bhilwara Rajasthan.

30. Bisram Yadav S/o Shri Jagan Prasad Yadav, Aged About 41 Years, Mukam Post Kervaval, Tehsil And Via Mala Kheda, District Alwar, Rajasthan Shri Ombeer Singh S/o Latoor Singh Rawat, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 103-B Keshav Park, Jamdoli, Agra Road, District Jaipur, Rajasthan

31. Manish Kumar Jaiman S/o Shri Mohan Lal Jaiman, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Balaji Ka Naya Mohalla Ward No. 16, Holekha Mandir Ka Pass, Bandikui, Dausa, Rajasthan.

32. Shri Mahesh Kumar Kabra S/o Shri Lal Chand Kabra, Aged [2025:RJ-JP:18019] (3 of 6) [CW-2420/2020] About 39 Years, R/o Vpo Paroli Tehsil Kotadi, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

34. Chhagan Lal Bheel S/o Dalaram Bheel, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Chanod Tehsil Sumerpur, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan. Thakur Singh Meena S/o Chuna Ram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, R/o V.p.o. Bankli, Tehsil Sumerpur, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan.

35. Manohar Kumar S/o Jasaram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 25 Sidhi Vinayak Colony Bilada, Dist. Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

36. Tikam Chand Meena S/o Raja Ram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, R/o V.p.o Anoppura, Tehsil Sumerpur, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan.

37. Mangilal Meena S/o Devaram Meena, Aged About 41 Years, R/o V.p.o. Boosi, Tehsil Pali, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan.

41. Laxman Singh Sisodiya S/o Deep Singh Sisodiya, Aged About 43 Years, R/o V.p.o Savarad Tehsil Marwad Junction, Dist. Pali, Rajasthan. Lokesh Kumar Srimali S/o Bhikalal Srimali, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 71, Ramayan Nagar Main Bazar Rani Station Dist. Pali, Rajasthan. Shrawan Singh S/o Arjun Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o V.p.o. Digarna, Tehsil Jaitaran Dist. Pali, Rajasthan. Bharat Singh S/o Bhoopsingh Jat, Vpo Kheda (Jamalpur) Tehsil Hindaun City, Dist. Karauli, Raj.

42. Manoj Kumar S/o Gheesulal Prajapat, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 260 A Janta Colony Dist. Pali, Rajasthan.

47. Ved Prakash S/o Gopal Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o V.p.o. Googamedi Tehsi Nohar, Dist. Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. Vijay Kumar S/o Norang Ram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o V.p.o. 16 S/w Jalalawad P.o. Maharwala, Tehsil Tibbi, Dist. Hanumangarh. Amit Kumar S/o Khushi Chand, Aged About 38 Years, Vpo Aliyan, District Shriganganagar. Praveen Kumar S/o Shri Rupa Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Jluthriya, Ward No. 16, Bindayaka, Jaipur. Surendra Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Babu Lal Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 23, Phase 1 Major Kanwalsingh Nagar, Jaipur Road, Chordungari, Alwar.

48. Mahendra Kumar Meena S/o Phool Chand Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Manda Bhim Singh Phulera, Jaipur.

49. Surendra Kumar Panwar S/o Shri Chunni Lal Panwar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 15, Vpo Dabli Rathan, District Hanumangarh.

50. Balram S/o Lalchand, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vpo Bhingh Bayla, Ward No. 16, Tehsil Padampur, District [2025:RJ-JP:18019] (4 of 6) [CW-2420/2020] Shriganganagar.

53. Rajendra Prasad Gajraj, S/o Jagdish Prasad Gajraj, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vpo Chala, Govindpura Rorad, Ward No. 7, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar. Vikram Singh S/o Narain Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Turkiyawas, Post Vijaypura, Via Narayanpur, Tehsil Thanagazi, Alwar. Haneef Khan Pathan S/o Mishri Khan Pathan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Vpo Dungrikalan, Via Renwal, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur

54. Mukesh Sharma S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 50 Sain Colony, Prem Nagar, Jhotwara Jaipur.

55. Navratan Verma S/o Gopi Ram Verma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Mehroli, Via Reengus, Tehsil Shri Madhopur, District Sikar Raj.

56. Manoj Kumar Bangar S/o Late Shri Purshottam Lal Bangar, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vp Amargarh, Via Kachola, Tehsil Jahajpur, District Bhilwara, Raj.

60. Ratan Lal Khatik S/o Shanti Lal Khatik, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Post Badliyas, Tehsil Kotdi, District Bhilwara, Raj. Dinesh Kumar Sharma S/o Gopal Krishna Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o S-74, Shivaji Nagar, Shyopur Road, Sanaganer, Pratap Nagar Jaipur Raj. Sandeep Kumar Singhal S/o Mahesh Chand Singhal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Purani Anaz Mandi, Bhusawar, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Raj. Babu Lal Choudhary S/o Bhura Ram Serawat, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Tiba Wali Kothi, Sherawato Ki Dhani, Hadota, Tehsil Chomu Jaipur Raj.

61. Manoj Kumar Sharma S/o Late Jagdish Narayan Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 70 Akhil Nagar, Opp. Sector 6- 7, Malviya Nagar Jaipur Raj.

62. Manmohan Upadhyay S/o Shri Ghanshyam Datt Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Chokhandi Mohalla, Kasba Bhusawar, District Bharatpur Rajasthan Versus ----Petitioners

3. Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Suresh Bishnoi S/o Not Known, Aged About 29 Years Through Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry, Pashudhan Bhawan Lalkothi Tonk Road, Jaipur, 302015. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:18019] (5 of 6) [CW-2420/2020] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.N. Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Utkarsh Dubey For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG Mr. Aaditya Godara HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL 29/04/2025 Order This writ petition is filed assailing the seniority list dated

04.07.2016 with a further prayer to direct the respondents to consider the services rendered by the petitioners from their initial date of appointment till regular selection, to extend them other service benefits and to pay them regular pay scale during the period of probation. Indisputably, the petitioners have an alternative and efficacious remedy for redressal of their grievance(s) before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur. The writ petition is bereft of any averment as to why the writ jurisdiction of this Court is invoked without exhausting the alternative and efficacious remedy available to them. When confronted with the aforesaid situation, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the writ petition was filed in the year 2020 wherein, notice has already been issued, they should not be relegated to the alternative remedy at this stage. He further submits that limitation would also come in way of approaching the Tribunal. This Court is not convinced that mere pendency of this writ petition at the admission stage since the year 2020 would make it [2025:RJ-JP:18019] (6 of 6) [CW-2420/2020] maintainable in view of the alternative and efficacious remedy available to the petitioners for redressal of their grievance(s) raised in the writ petition. Moreso, when, no explanation is offered in the memo of writ petition as to why it should be entertained without exhausting the alternative remedy. So far as the question of limitation is concerned, it is open for the petitioners to move an appropriate application seeking condonation of delay before the learned Tribunal which, obviously, is under an obligation to decide the same in accordance with the law keeping in view the period of pendency of this writ petition before this Court. Resultantly, this writ petition is dismissed for availability of the alternative and efficacious remedy to the petitioners. The petitioners are at liberty to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. PRAGATI/98 (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments