✦ High Court of India · 15 Jan 2025

District Jaipur, Rajasthan. vs Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,

Case Details High Court of India · 15 Jan 2025
Court
High Court of India
Decided
15 Jan 2025
Bench
Not available
Length
1,211 words

41 Years, R/o Village Divarala, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

26. Praveen Sharma S/o Kailash Chand Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 39-B, Vardhman Nagar, Heerapura, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (3 of 5) [CW-410/2025]

27. Shubham Vijay S/o Shivdayal Vijay, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Shivaji Nagar, Near Water Tank, Baran, Rajasthan.

28. Ravindra Chouhan S/o Vijay Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 32, Bhami Basti, Dabla Road, Churu, Rajasthan

29. Aman Meena S/o Kailash Chand Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Moondoti Meeno Ka Bhera, Post Moondoti, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

30. Bhavesh Kumhar S/o Raman Lal Kumhar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Diwara Chhota, Tehsil Sagwara, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan.

31. Vikash Kumar S/o Mukh Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o 13 Rjd, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

32. Vijay Laxmi Charan D/o Kalyan Singh Charan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Karni Temple, Karni Colony, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

33. Rajesh S/o Gordhan Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Basani Kaviyan, Post Chanwandia Kallan, Via Kushalpura, District Pali, Rajasthan.

34. Vikram Singh Panwar S/o Bhoor Singh Panwar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Basani Kaviyan, Post Chanwandia Kallan, Tehsil Raipur, District Pali, Rajasthan.

35. Vikash Choudhary S/o Lala Ram Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Laxminarayanpura, Post Rampura Unti, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

36. Lalit Singh Sisodiya S/o Bheem Singh Sisodiya, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ho Bhim Singh Mohan Singh Ki Dhani, Vishnu Nagar, Vpo Lunawas, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

37. Rekha Rajput D/o Sher Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Mundana, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

38. Arvind Singh S/o Chandarbhan Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Plot No. 21, Shri Govind Nagar-Iii Extn. Near Olampia City, Benar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

39. Anita Solanki D/o Muparam Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Asop Colony, Behind Saket Asharam Sumerpur, District Pali, Rajasthan.

40. Ravi Prakash Swami S/o Mani Ram Swami, Aged About 27 (4 of 5) [CW-410/2025] Years, R/o Vpo Kayamsar, Tehsil Ramgarh Shekhawati, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

41. Kalyan Singh Seervi S/o Gena Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Khariya Cement Factory, Bera Navoda Khariya, Meethapur, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

42. Sumer Choyal S/o Kana Ram Choyal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Choyalo Ki Dhimari, Bilara, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

43. Chandra Prakash Yadav S/o Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Lamiya, Via Khatushyamji, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

44. Kamlesh Kumar S/o Chela Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Daniyo Ka Vas, Naralai, Tehsil Desuri, District Pali, Rajasthan.

45. Manraj Gurjar S/o Rampal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o C- 56, Maa Vaishno Residency, Kalwar Road, Hathoj, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

46. Pooja Gurjar D/o Ram Vilas Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o A-50, Moharu Nagar, Manyawas, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

47. Saroj Choudhary D/o Shrinarayan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nitharwali Ki Dhani, Chandka Khurd, Phagi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 15/01/2025 (5 of 5) [CW-410/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the instant matter is squarely covered by the judgement dated

09.12.2024 passed by Coordinate Bench of the Court in SBCWP No.12726/2024 titled as Vikram Verma & Ors. vs. RSSB, wherein petitioners were given liberty to file a representation within a period of 10 days and directions were given to the respondents to adjudicate the same. Considering the akin controversy, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the present writ petition be decided in light of the Vikram Verma (supra). Considering the facts and circumstances of the instant matter, and considering the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court deems it apposite to dispose of the present petition in light of the order passed in Vikram Verma (supra) and grants a liberty to the petitioners to submit their representation before the appropriate authority. Respondents are directed to adjudicate the said representation within an upper limit of four weeks from the date of filing of representation, byway of a speaking order, following the principles of natural justice, and strictly in accordance with law and governing policies. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. DIKSHA MISHRA /51 (SAMEER JAIN),J

41 Years, R/o Village Divarala, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

26. Praveen Sharma S/o Kailash Chand Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 39-B, Vardhman Nagar, Heerapura, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (3 of 5) [CW-410/2025]

27. Shubham Vijay S/o Shivdayal Vijay, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Shivaji Nagar, Near Water Tank, Baran, Rajasthan.

28. Ravindra Chouhan S/o Vijay Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 32, Bhami Basti, Dabla Road, Churu, Rajasthan

29. Aman Meena S/o Kailash Chand Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Moondoti Meeno Ka Bhera, Post Moondoti, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

30. Bhavesh Kumhar S/o Raman Lal Kumhar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Diwara Chhota, Tehsil Sagwara, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan.

31. Vikash Kumar S/o Mukh Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o 13 Rjd, District Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.

32. Vijay Laxmi Charan D/o Kalyan Singh Charan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Karni Temple, Karni Colony, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

33. Rajesh S/o Gordhan Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Basani Kaviyan, Post Chanwandia Kallan, Via Kushalpura, District Pali, Rajasthan.

34. Vikram Singh Panwar S/o Bhoor Singh Panwar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Basani Kaviyan, Post Chanwandia Kallan, Tehsil Raipur, District Pali, Rajasthan.

35. Vikash Choudhary S/o Lala Ram Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Laxminarayanpura, Post Rampura Unti, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

36. Lalit Singh Sisodiya S/o Bheem Singh Sisodiya, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ho Bhim Singh Mohan Singh Ki Dhani, Vishnu Nagar, Vpo Lunawas, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

37. Rekha Rajput D/o Sher Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Mundana, Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

38. Arvind Singh S/o Chandarbhan Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Plot No. 21, Shri Govind Nagar-Iii Extn. Near Olampia City, Benar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

39. Anita Solanki D/o Muparam Meghwal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Asop Colony, Behind Saket Asharam Sumerpur, District Pali, Rajasthan.

40. Ravi Prakash Swami S/o Mani Ram Swami, Aged About 27 (4 of 5) [CW-410/2025] Years, R/o Vpo Kayamsar, Tehsil Ramgarh Shekhawati, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

41. Kalyan Singh Seervi S/o Gena Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Near Khariya Cement Factory, Bera Navoda Khariya, Meethapur, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

42. Sumer Choyal S/o Kana Ram Choyal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Choyalo Ki Dhimari, Bilara, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

43. Chandra Prakash Yadav S/o Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Lamiya, Via Khatushyamji, District Sikar, Rajasthan.

44. Kamlesh Kumar S/o Chela Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Daniyo Ka Vas, Naralai, Tehsil Desuri, District Pali, Rajasthan.

45. Manraj Gurjar S/o Rampal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o C- 56, Maa Vaishno Residency, Kalwar Road, Hathoj, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

46. Pooja Gurjar D/o Ram Vilas Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o A-50, Moharu Nagar, Manyawas, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

47. Saroj Choudhary D/o Shrinarayan Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nitharwali Ki Dhani, Chandka Khurd, Phagi, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 15/01/2025 (5 of 5) [CW-410/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the instant matter is squarely covered by the judgement dated

09.12.2024 passed by Coordinate Bench of the Court in SBCWP No.12726/2024 titled as Vikram Verma & Ors. vs. RSSB, wherein petitioners were given liberty to file a representation within a period of 10 days and directions were given to the respondents to adjudicate the same. Considering the akin controversy, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the present writ petition be decided in light of the Vikram Verma (supra). Considering the facts and circumstances of the instant matter, and considering the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this court deems it apposite to dispose of the present petition in light of the order passed in Vikram Verma (supra) and grants a liberty to the petitioners to submit their representation before the appropriate authority. Respondents are directed to adjudicate the said representation within an upper limit of four weeks from the date of filing of representation, byway of a speaking order, following the principles of natural justice, and strictly in accordance with law and governing policies. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. DIKSHA MISHRA /51 (SAMEER JAIN),J

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments