S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15179/2024 v. Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14571/2024
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
they are enlarged on bail
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 483
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 61(2)(b), 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 111(6), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4)
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Jhuriya Mukesh S/o Bhanwarlal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Aajwa, P.s. Didwana Dist Didwana Kuchaman . (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail Didwana) Sunil Mirdha S/o Chenaram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dudoli, P.s. Didwana Dist Didwana Kuchaman. (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail Didwana) ----Petitioners…
Judgment
Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Mohanram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Begpura, P.s.- Chitawa, Dist - Didwana- Kuchaman , Raj. (Lodged In Sub Jail , Didwana) State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp Versus ----Petitioner ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14572/2024
Jhuriya Mukesh S/o Bhanwarlal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Aajwa, P.s. Didwana Dist Didwana Kuchaman . (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail Didwana) Sunil Mirdha S/o Chenaram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dudoli, P.s. Didwana Dist Didwana Kuchaman. (Presently Lodged In Sub Jail Didwana) ----Petitioners State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp Versus ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Bishnoi Mr. Ram Prakash Dudy Mr. Manoj Kumar Mr. S.R. Godara Mr. Ashok Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 21/01/2025 [2025:RJ-JD:3835] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15179/2024] These applications for bail under Section 483 BNSS have been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.280/2024 registered at Police Station Deedwana, District Deedwana- Kuchaman, for the offences punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 111(6), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4), 61(2)(b) of BNS. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor.
Perused the material available on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel submitted that the allegation against the present petitioners is of committing economic offences of illegally sending and converting money obtained by defrauding people from INR to Cryptocurrency through Binance mobile application. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the investigation against the petitioners has already been concluded and the challan against them has already been filed by the investigating agency before the competent criminal Court. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.
Operative part
Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, this Court prima facie finds that the investigation against the petitioners has already been concluded and the prosecution has not shown any apprehension of the petitioner [2025:RJ-JD:3835] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15179/2024] influencing the remaining material prosecution witnesses or fleeing away from justice or tampering with the evidence, in case they are enlarged on bail. Thus, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail applications filed by the petitioners deserve to be accepted. Consequently, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Manish S/o Daula Ram, (2) Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Mohanram, (3) Mukesh Jhuriya S/o Bhanwarlal and (4) Sunil Mirdha S/o Chenaram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.280/2024 registered at Police Station Deedwana, District Deedwana- Kuchaman, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for their appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same. A copy of this order be placed in each file. 41-43 divya/- (KULDEEP MATHUR),J
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: they are enlarged on bail
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 61(2)(b), 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 111(6), 317(2), 317(5), 318(4).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.