Judicature For Rajasthan High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in view of relief having been granted to the petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes that he would handover the cheques in question to the petitioners for encashment. No order as to costs. ss-…
Judgment
O R D E R S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9397/2008 Durg Singh and ors. V/s ESI and ors. Date of Order ::: 20th December 2011 P R E S E N T HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. Moti Singh, for the petitioner Mr. R.K. Soni, for the respondents. ---
The five cheques as per the following details have been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioners against the benefits due to 5 petitioners, legal representatives of deceased late Sh. Sumer Singh, who was covered under the provisions of ESI Act, 1948 and token receipt thereof has been given by the learned counsel for the petitioner in pursuance of order passed by this Court on 12.12.2011. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cheque No. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 532732 Rupees Rs. 48237/- Durg Singh Name 532733 532734 532735 Ganwar Kanwar Rs. 48237/- Dhapu Kanwar Nainu Kanwar Rs. 48237/- Rs. 48237/- 532736 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Madu Kanwar Rs. 48237/- S.B.C.W.P. No.9397/2008 – Durg Singh and ors. V/s ESI and ors. Order dtd: 20/12/2011
The learned Counsel for the respondent – ESI Corporation further undertakes to continue medical benefits to the dependents of the deceased covered employee late Sh. Sumer Singh till they attain the majority as per the relevant provisions. The learned counsel for the respondent also sought exemption from personal appearance of the officer concerned Mr. B.C. Meena, who is said to be looking after his mother who is admitted in Fortis Hospital, in ICU, Jaipur. In view of aforesaid, exemption from personal appearance is granted.
Operative part
Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in view of relief having been granted to the petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes that he would handover the cheques in question to the petitioners for encashment. No order as to costs. ss- 79 (DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
ESI Act, 1948.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 20 Dec 2011. The bench was VINEET KOTHARI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.