S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.3663/2007 (Sethu alias Roopa Ram v. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : August 13
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.R.K.Charan, for the petitioner. Mr.Vidhyawati Boda, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned as well as police investigation diary. The offences are triable by the Court of Judicial Magistrate. Investigation and trial are likely to take a long time. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Sethu alias Roopa Ram s/o Pallu Ram be released on bail in FIR No.14/2007, P.S. Pilwa, Distt. Nagaur provided he furnishes a personal bond 2 in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 13 Aug 2007. The bench was H R PANWAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.