✦ Rajasthan High Court · 13 May 2008

Judgment · High Court · 2008

GOVIND MATHUR

Case at a glance

Judgment

Mr. Anil Vyas, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Chhangani, for the respondent. Mr. Shyam Ladrecha, Addl. Govt. Advocate. **** The only ground to challenge the judgment dated 15.5.2007 passed by the learned Rajasthan Non-government Educational Institutions Tribunal, Jaipur is that the petitioner institution is not a recognised institute. The argument advanced is absolutely ill founded in view of the fact that even as per the petitioner the Society is getting recurring aid from the Government of Rajasthan. Under the Rajasthan Non- government Educational Institutions Act, 1989 no institution can get aid without having recognition. If the argument of the petitioner is accepted then the petitioner has to refund to the Government of Rajasthan, whatever aid received by it. Relevant to note here that an order of recognition granted by the Government of Rajasthan to the petitioner institution is also available on record as Annexure-2. The constitution of the petitioner Society also refers that it is recognised by the Government of Rajasthan and is also getting aid. For the reasons mentioned above this petition for writ is having no merit and therefore dismissed. (GOVIND MATHUR),J. Jgoyal

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Educational Institutions Act, 1989; Constitution of India.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Rajasthan High Court, on 13 May 2008. The bench was GOVIND MATHUR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments