S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Appli. No.5377/2007 (Devi Lal & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : November 14
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.B.S.Rathore, for the petitioners. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the police investigation diary. The allegation against the petitioners is that they were in possession of poppy straw and by seeing the police party, they threw the bag containing poppy straw and fled away. The petitioners were identified by police constables Raj Mal and Hari Singh. In this view of the matter, in my view, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The bail application filed by the petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, dismissed. (H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 14 Nov 2007. The bench was BLE H R PANWAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.