Mota Ram v. State of Rajasthan) Date of order
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 11 Dec 2006
- Bench
- BLE H R PANWAR
Provisions considered
Judgment
HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. D.L.Mothsara the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and the challan papers. The first bail application came to be dismissed as it was not pressed. At that time, the matter was at the investigation stage. However, now after investigation, the police has filed challan. I have also gone through the injury report of the injured. The injury alleged to have been assigned to the present petitioner is simple in nature though by sharp. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, without commenting on the merit of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this second bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Mota Ram S/o 2 Sultan be released on bail in FIR No. 444/06 P.S. Nohar, district Hanumangarh, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. RP (H.R.PANWAR), J.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 11 Dec 2006. The bench was BLE H R PANWAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.