S.B. CR. BAIL APPLICATION No. 5037 of 2007 · Rajasthan High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant bail application has become infructuous. In view of the statement of counsel for the petitioner, the bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as having become infructuous. (H.R.PANWAR), J.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 11 Oct 2007. The bench was BLE H R PANWAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. S.B. CR. BAIL APPLICATION No. 5037 of 2007).
← Search more judgments