1 S.B.CR. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.4787/2007 (Jagdish & Anr. v. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
HON'BLE MR. H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.V.K.Bhadu, for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Upadhyaya, P.P. for the State. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation of causing injury is against petitioner No.1 and so far as petitioner No.2 is concerned, there is no allegation against him. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and contends that both the petitioners and co-accused Mahaveer came together and inflicted injuries to first informant on the skull and other parts of body as also extorted the money from the shop of first informant and taken away the liquor from the liquor shop of the injured with intention to commit the offences. From perusal of the order impugned, it appears that 2 petitioner No.1 Jagdish is history-sheeter of police station, Bhadra and petitioner No.2 is his associate in committing the offence. Keeping in view the manner in which the occurrence took place, in my view, it is not at all a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The bail application filed by both the petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. [H.R.PANWAR],J. m.asif/-
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 26 Sep 2007. The bench was BLE H R PANWAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.