Kishan Lal v. State of Rajasthan) Date of order
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 27 Sep 2007
- Bench
- BLE H R PANWAR
Provisions considered
Judgment
HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J. Mr. Mukesh Sharma, for the petitioner. Mr. V.R.Mehta, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned and police investigation diary. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the illicit liquor was recovered from Richpal Singh's house in his presence and the petitioner was not present. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has nothing to do with the illicit liquor as also has no relation with Richpal Singh. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Kishan Lal S/o Shri Makhan Lal be released on bail in FIR No. 42/2006 P.S. Aabkari Thana, Ratangarh, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 2 10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. RP (H.R.PANWAR), J.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 27 Sep 2007. The bench was BLE H R PANWAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.