✦ Rajasthan High Court · 08 Aug 2007

S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1059/2007 (Irshad Khan & Ors. v. State) & Ors.

BLE SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

petition stands dismissed as not

Judgment

Operative part

HON'BLE MR. SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J. Mr. Sabir Khan ) Mr. Pradeep Shah ) for the petitioners. Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor for the State. By moving the present criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners have challenged the order dated 11.07.2007 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu in Criminal Misc. Case No.92/2007 (Smt. Tanjeem Banu & Anr. Vs.Iqbal Khan & Ors.) and prays that proceedings pending before the learned trial court under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 may be quashed. It is not in dispute that appropriate provisions are there in the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for challenging the order impugned by way of appeal, therefore, the petitioner first to approach the appellate Court, if so advised. 2 The misc. petition stands dismissed as not maintainable with the observation that the petitioner shall be free to file appeal before the concerned Court and the time spent in pursuing the remedy before this Court shall not come in way of the petitioner for the purpose of calculating the period of limitation. (SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition stands dismissed as not

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Rajasthan High Court, on 08 Aug 2007. The bench was BLE SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments