✦ Rajasthan High Court · 17 May 2006

Criminal Misc. II Bail Application No. 1932/2006 Chokha Ram alias Chhoga Ram v. State of Rajasthan) Date of Order: May 17

MISC. II BAIL APPLICATION No. 1932 of 2006BLE H R PANWAR

Case at a glance

Decided
17 May 2006
Bench
BLE H R PANWAR

Judgment

HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J. Mr. M.L. Bishnoi, for the petitioner. Mr. JPS Chaudhary, Public Prosecutor for the State. This is second bail application. The first bail application came to be dismissed vide order dated 07-4-2006 as it was not pressed by the counsel appearing for the petitioner, however, a liberty was granted to file a fresh application after Challan is filed. Counsel for the petitioner has filed Challan papers. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. Perused the Challan papers. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the offence against the petitioner is under Section8/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Nothing has been recovered from the petitioner and the recovery of 1.070 kg. opium was from co-accused Moti Ram. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that nothing has been recovered from the present petitioner, I consider it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Chokha Ram alias Chhoga Ram alias Chhogji S/o Lakha Ram be released on bail in FIR No. 29/2006, Police Station, Mandar, district Sirohi, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (H.R. PANWAR), J.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — ss. 8, 29; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Rajasthan High Court, on 17 May 2006. The bench was BLE H R PANWAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. MISC. II BAIL APPLICATION No. 1932 of 2006). ← Search more judgments