✦ Rajasthan High Court · 11 Feb 2008

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No.591/2008 (Deepak Khatri v. State of Rajasthan) Date of order : February 11

S.B.CR.MISC. BAIL APP No. 591 of 2008BLE H R PANWAR

Case at a glance

Decided
11 Feb 2008
Bench
BLE H R PANWAR

Provisions considered

Judgment

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J. Mr.B.S.Mertiya, for the petitioner. Mr.J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated co-accused Bhaskar alias Teena has been granted bail by this Court vide order dt. 16.11.2007 and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of co- accused. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the oral arguments advanced by both the parties, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Deepak Khatri s/o Vishnu Bhai be released on bail in FIR No.244/2007, P.S. 2 Raipur, Distt. Pali provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. m.asif/- (H.R.PANWAR),J.

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Rajasthan High Court, on 11 Feb 2008. The bench was BLE H R PANWAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. S.B.CR.MISC. BAIL APP No. 591 of 2008). ← Search more judgments