FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR 1 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 574/2010 STATE & Ors. v. SARLA DEVI GAUR 2 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 721/2009 STATE & Ors.

48 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05345/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. SUMITRA DEVI & ORS 49 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05381/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MANISH KUMAR DADHICH & ORS 50 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05382/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHAMPA LAL 51 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05391/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VANA RAM CHOUDHARY 52 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05418/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PRAHLAD KUMAR TELI & ORS 53 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05460/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SUJA RAM 4 54 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05461/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GORDHAN LAL & ORS 55 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05463/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. HEERA SING & ORS. 56 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05467/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DEVENDRA KUMAR & ORS 57 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05486/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAJENDRA KUMAR RAGHAWAT & ORS 58 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05489/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHANDAN SINGH 59 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05494/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. HAMEERA RAM 60 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05495/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. INDRA & ORS. 61 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05496/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GOPI LAL & ANR. 62 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05499/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BANSI LAL 63 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05501/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NAZIR KHAN & ORS 64 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05502/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NARAYAN RAM 65 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05504/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DALPAT SINGH & ORS. 66 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05516/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BUTA RAM 67 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05519/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DILAWAR SINGH 68 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05520/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ANUPRIYA VYAS & ORS 69 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05526/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA 70 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05527/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VIKRAM SINGH PANWAR & ORS. 71 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05548/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. LAL SINGH YADAV & ORS. 5 72 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05581/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DEVA RAM BALAI & ORS 73 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05582/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. M.S. KIRAN SHARMA & ORS. 74 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05583/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHIVDAS VAISHNAV & ORS 75 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05630/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ASHOK KUMAR PANWAR 76 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05647/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RANA RAM 77 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05663/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MANGILAL VERMA & ORS 78 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05807/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MADAN SINGH & ORS 79 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05808/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ASHU DAN & ORS 80 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05818/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SANTOSH BHASKAR AND ORS. 81 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05820/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ANIL KUMAR BARESA & ORS 82 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05836/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAMESH SHILU & ORS 83 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05838/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. POONAM CHAND SOLANKI & ANR 84 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05848/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR & ORS 85 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05849/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NAND KISHORE DAVE & ORS 86 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05853/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SANDEEP SWAMI & ORS. 87 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05854/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHIV LAL JAT & ORS 88 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05886/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MANA RAM & ORS 89 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05888/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. AKHLAKH MOHAMMED & ORS 6 90 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05916/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BALVEER BANGRA 91 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05918/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VINOD VYAS & ORS. 92 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05927/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PEMA RAM & ORS 93 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06108/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHANDAR BISHNOI & ORS 94 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06109/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. AJAY KUMAR MALI 95 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06112/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RUGNATH RAM & ORS 96 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06114/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHIV SHANKAR SUTHAR & ORS 97 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06115/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NAVEEN KUMAR & ORS 98 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06116/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAMNIWAS SHARMA & ORS 99 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06156/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ATAI KHAN & ORS 100 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06168/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. LALIT KUMAR 101 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06169/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MAHIRAM VISHNOI & ORS 102 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06170/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DINESH KUMAR GAUTAM & ORS 103 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06171/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GENDMAL MENARIA & ORS. 104 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06172/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHURJEE & ORS 105 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06188/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SAHDEV RAM & ORS 106 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06189/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ASHOK KUMAR & ORS 107 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06190/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. ANSHU MATHUR @ ANSHU SRIVA.& ORS. 7 108 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06191/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DEEWAN SINGH 109 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06192/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. SUA 110 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06193/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BALDEVB VYAS 111 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06194/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VINOD SINGH & ORS 112 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06195/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. MAINA KANWAR & ORS 113 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06196/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PREM RAJ LAKHARA & ORS 114 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06197/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MAG SINGH 115 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06212/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. OM PRAKASH BISHNOI & ORS 116 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06240/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHANWAR LAL PALIWAL 117 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06247/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAJKUMAR & ORS. 118 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06255/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GAUTAMCHAND & ORS. 119 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06260/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DINESH CHANDRA LABANA & ORS 120 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06519/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NARESH CHANDRA AMETA & ORS 121 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06521/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PUKH RAJ AND ANR, 122 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06523/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NEMI CHAND 123 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06655/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SUNITA KUMARI & ORS. 124 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06657/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHOPAL SINGH RAO & ANR 125 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06712/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KAILASH KUMAR & ORS 8 126 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06714/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NATHU RAM PRAJAPAT & ORS. 127 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06719/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ASHOK DADHICH & ORS 128 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06735/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. HARI PRASAD VYAS & ORS 129 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06736/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NARPAT RAM 130 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06738/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PRABHU DAN CHARAN & ORS. 131 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06739/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PRAKASH CHANDRA LOOR & ANR. 132 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06744/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BALVEER SINGH & ORS 133 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06745/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ROOPA RAM & ORS. 134 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06746/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHINWA RAM & ORS 135 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06747/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. KIRAN & ORS 136 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06995/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MANJU DEVI & ORS. 137 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07073/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VISHAL RAM 138 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07076/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KUMARI JETHI 139 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07077/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GANESH RAM & ORS 140 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07079/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BABU LAL & ORS 141 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07094/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. MANJU KUMARI JAIN & ANR. 142 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07102/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MAHENDRA CHANDEL & ORS. 143 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07103/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KHIRAJ SINGH & ORS. 144 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07104/2009 9 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. JOG RAJ SUTHAR & ANR 145 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07106/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ANITA CHOUHAN & ORS. 146 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07110/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SURESH KUMAR GODARA & ANR 147 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07111/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA & ORS 148 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07112/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RATAN & ORS. 149 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07118/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MOOL SINGH & ORS 150 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07119/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DURGA PRASAD 151 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07120/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DEEPA RAM 152 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07121/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHANDRA MUKESH MEENA & ANR 153 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07131/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. OMA RAM & ORS 154 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07132/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MADAN SINGH & ORS. 155 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07148/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHANDAN MAL LOHAR & ORS. 156 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07245/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KANHAIYA LAL BERWA & ORS 157 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07246/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NARAYAN SINGH & ORS 158 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07247/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHARWAN RAM BENIWAL & ORS. 159 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07257/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SANJAY SHARMA & ORS 160 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07258/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHANKER LAL PARMAR & ORS 161 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07259/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VIJAY KUMAR BISHNOI & ORS 10 162 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07266/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BAHADUR SINGH & ORS 163 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07268/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NEMA RAM & ORS 164 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07308/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SURAJMAL BHAGORA & ORS. 165 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07309/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ANIS AHMED MANSURI & ANR. 166 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07310/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MUKESH KUMAR DAVE & ORS 167 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07342/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHIV RAJ GOUR & ORS. 168 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07352/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GOPAL GURJAR 169 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07353/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ABDUL SATTAR 170 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07569/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. POPAT LAL 171 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07570/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SURENDRA KUMAR & ORS 172 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07597/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHANWAR SINGH 173 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07601/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SURESHPURI GOSWAMI &ORS 174 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07602/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VIVEK AMETA 175 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07660/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BALDEV RAM & ORS 176 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07662/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PARKASH CHANDRA SHARMA & ANR 177 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07663/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. OM PRAKASH 178 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07666/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHAMPA LAL SONI & ORS 179 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07668/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ASHA KUMARI & ORS 11 180 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07691/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DASHRATH CHARAN & ORS. 181 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07692/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAJENDRA VERMA & ORS. 182 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07694/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. JAGDISH & ORS. 183 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07695/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PUSHPA CHOUHAN & ORS. 184 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07696/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAJA RAM 185 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07697/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RODI LAL 186 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07698/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHAMPA LAL MEGHWAL & ORS 187 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07699/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. JAGDISH CHANDRA GURJAR & ORS 188 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07701/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. HANUMAN RAM AND ORS. 189 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07702/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. SANTOSH PAREEK 190 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07703/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHAKTI DAN CHARAN & ORS 191 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07704/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VINOD KUMAR & ORS 192 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07714/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. LAXMI LAL KHATIK & ORS 193 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07715/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KHUSHPAL SINGH & ORS 194 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07717/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. YAMUNA SHANKER & ORS 195 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07718/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KUNDAN SINGH & ORS. 196 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07719/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHANDRA SHEKHAR PUROHIT & ORS 197 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07721/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SATA RAM & ORS 12 198 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07722/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. AJA RAM & ORS 199 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07723/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAMLAL GAMAR & ORS 200 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07724/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GOVIND LAL & ORS 201 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07725/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MOTI SINGH 202 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07726/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MADAN SINGH 203 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07727/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHARAT SINGH & ORS. 204 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07728/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DEVKARAN MAHIYAN & ORS. 205 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07739/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DHARMA RAM & ORS 206 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07794/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAJ KUMAR SHARMA & ORS 207 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07815/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. HARMAN GHANCHI 208 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07821/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KANARAM & ORS 209 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07824/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. HEM RAJ MEGHWANSHI & ORS 210 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07825/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ABHAY SINGH & ORS 211 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07828/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. LOKESH PURBIA 212 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07829/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHOM SINGH 213 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07872/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DINESH SINGARIA & ORS 214 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07874/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NANULAL BUJH & ORS. 215 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07875/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SANJAY KUMAR SHARMA & ORS 13 216 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07883/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SOHAN LAL MEGHWAL & ORS. 217 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07884/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHNTI CHOUDHARY & ORS 218 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07885/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DHARMA RAM & ORS 219 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07888/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. JAGDISH & ORS. 220 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07889/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KHARTHA RAM & ORS 221 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07890/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DINESH KUMAR & ORS 222 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07891/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KEVA RAM & ORS 223 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07901/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SUKHDAV SINGH & ORS 224 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07902/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PRAVEEN KUMAR VYAS & ORS 225 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07903/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PUSHPA KUMARI 226 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07912/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHANWAR LAL & ORS 227 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07913/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DINESH KUMAR SEN & ORS 228 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07914/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DINESH KUMAR SHARMA 229 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01438/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ASHOK SINGH 230 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01439/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. LALA RAM CHOUDHARY & ORS. 231 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01444/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MS. SUMITRA & ORS 232 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01445/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MADAN LAL & ORS 233 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01446/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GAJENDRA SINGH & ORS 14 234 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01447/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GAMANDA RAM & ORS 235 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01448/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NATWAR LAL & ORS. 236 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01449/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHANWARI DEVI & ORS 237 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01469/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHEEM DAN & ORS 238 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01470/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KANTA KUMARI AMETA & ANR. 239 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01471/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. HEENA PARMAR & ORS 240 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01472/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BRIJ LAL JAKHAR & ORS 241 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01473/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VIKRAM SINGH 242 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01474/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DEVENDRA KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. 243 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01489/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VEER SINGH MAIDA & ORS 244 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01490/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. HANUMANT RATHORE & ORS 245 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01491/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PRITI TELAG 246 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01492/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VANA RAM & ORS. 247 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01493/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GHEWAR SINGH & ORS 248 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01507/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KANNA SINGH 249 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01508/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NARAYAN SINGH & ORS 250 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01509/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAJENDRA CHOUDHARY & ANR 251 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01512/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MADAN LAL PARIHAR & ORS 15 252 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01533/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. SAROJ RAWAT & ORS 253 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01534/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. LADU LAL KHATIK & ORS 254 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01535/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KISTURA RAM CHOUDHARY 255 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01536/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GHANSHYAM KUMAR VYAS & ORS 256 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01537/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAMESH CHANDRA PATIDAR 257 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01538/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NARENDRA KUMAR & ORS 258 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01589/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MANJU DEVI 259 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01590/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MEGHA RAM & ANR 260 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01601/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. UDAI SINGH & ORS 261 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01707/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KAVITA 262 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01708/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MAHENDRA SINGH & ORS 263 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01709/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. JAGDISH & ORS 264 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01722/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DEEPAK SINGH & ORS. 265 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01723/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SANGRAM SINGH CHUNDAWAT & ORS. 266 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01724/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. LAXMAN LAL BHIL & ORS 267 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01725/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. NEENA MALIK 268 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01947/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SUNITA BHAT 269 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01948/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MANOJ KUMAR 270 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01949/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. SUNITA RANI 16 271 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01953/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MOENDEEN MANSURI & ANR. 272 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01955/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MANGU SINGH & ORS. 273 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01959/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MAHESH KHOJA & ORS. 274 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 01970/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAJ KUMAR TOLAMBIA & ORS. 275 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02001/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHYOCHAND GIR & ORS 276 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02078/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SHANKERLAL KATARA & ORS 277 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02140/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KOMAL DEVI & ORS 278 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02141/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MAHENDER SINGH 279 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02142/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. POOJA PAREEK 280 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02143/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SURESH KUMAR BHATI & ORS 281 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02144/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SAMEER BHATT & ORS. 282 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02157/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ALKA JAIN & ORS. 283 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02158/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MADAN GOPAL & ORS 284 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02199/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GURJENDRA SINGH & ANR 285 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02200/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ANITA DEORA & ORS 286 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02338/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MADHUSUDAN SUKHWAL 287 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02339/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MANOHAR LAL BISHNOI &ORS. 288 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02340/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PURSHOTTAM LAL SHARMA & ORS. 17 289 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02365/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHAGWAT SINGH & ORS 290 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02366/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. HARI SHANKAR MANMIYA & ORS 291 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02388/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. DILIP KUMAR 292 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02400/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHAWANI SHANKAR SHARMA & ORS 293 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02401/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MOHAN SINGH CHUNDAWAT & ORS. 294 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02414/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MATHURA LAL GURJER & ORS 295 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02418/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MEENA 296 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02419/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAKESH & ORS 297 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02422/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. GAUTAMCHAND DAIYA & ORS 298 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02460/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MRS. ANAMIKA PAREEK 299 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02461/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SANGEETA MENARIA & ORS 300 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02937/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. JAI NARAYAN & ORS 301 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02938/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NARENDER VEER SINGH & ORS 302 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05498/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KIRAN DEVI & ORS 303 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 07716/2009 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. TIKURAM & ORS 304 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 02462/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PRAVEEN SINGH & ORS 305 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05213/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PANNA RAM JAT 306 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05214/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KAMLESH KUMAR & ANR. 18 307 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05215/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. RENU HINGAD & ORS 308 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05235/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. REWAT SINGH & ORS 309 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05241/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHETAN RAM KARWASRA & ANR 310 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05242/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SITA RAM & ORS 311 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05243/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MONIKA CHOUDHARY & ORS 312 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05244/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KARAN SINGH & ORS 313 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05245/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PARAS RAM 314 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05246/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MAHESH KUMAR JOSHI & ORS 315 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05247/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. PRIYANKA SAIN & ORS 316 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05248/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. JITENDRA SINGH & ORS 317 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 05249/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. NARENDRA SINGH & ORS 318 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO.06485/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. OM PRAKASH 319 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06486/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VINOD KUMAR MAIDA & ORS 320 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06493/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SMT. SUMAN & ANR. 321 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06498/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BABU RAM CHOUDHARY & ORS 322 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06564/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. SATYA PRAKASH BALAI & ORS 323 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06565/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. AMBA LAL 324 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06570/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHARAN JEET KOUR & ORS 19 325 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06571/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. ARJUN RAM 326 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06573/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. CHAMPA LAL 327 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06574/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. VIDYA SURAGI 328 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06575/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. BHIKA RAM 329 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06576/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. MAHESH KUMAR & ANR. 330 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06580/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. KEHRA RAM & ORS 331 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06585/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. PREM RAJ 332 D.B.CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL (W) NO. 06658/2010 STATE OF RAJ. & ORS. Vs. RAJESH GHOTI & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT :: 07-12-2010 PRESENT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI Mr. R.L. Jangid, Additional Advocate General for the appellants. Mr. R.S. Chundawat, Mr. Sumer Singh Rathore, Mr. S.S. Jodha, Mr. Ramesh Purohit, for the respondents. These intra-court appeals have been preferred as against the decision rendered by the Single Bench in bunch of 503 writ applications decided by a common order on 15.5.2009. Single Bench of this Court has followed the decision rendered by the Single Bench in Sarita Vs. State of Rajasthan (2010 (1) RLW 275 (Raj.)) in which direction was issued to continue Vidhyarthi Mitras (teachers) till regularly selected candidates are available. 20 The facts in short are that the respondents were appointed as Vidhyarthi Mitras. The Scheme was framed by the State of Rajasthan initially on 7.9.2006 mentioning that there were large number of vacant posts and it was not possible to fill up the vacancies by the prescribed mode of selection by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission nor it was possible to hold Departmental Promotion Committee. Consequently in the interest of education, its availability, and continuance of education, it was considered appropriate to frame a scheme called as “Vidhyarthi Mitra Yojana”. The appointments were to be made on fixed amount, however, the appointments were made on contract basis for the particular academic session. The petitioners had been appointed as Vidhyarthi Mitras under similar circular dated 2.6.2008. There were 6000 vacancies of Lecturers, 5000 vacancies of Senior teachers and 1250 vacancies of Teacher Gr. III. The scheme was approved by the Finance Department vide circular dated 09.01.2007. The appointments which were made, were to be continued till 29.2.2009, however as February, 2009 was of 28 days, a corrigendum was issued and term was extended till 15.4.2009. As the term of appointments were extended upto 15.4.2009, several petitions were filed. Interim orders were passed not only at Principle Seat but at the Bench at Jaipur also. Bunch of writ petitions was decided by the Jaipur Bench in Sarita Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). The stand of the State Government is that appointments were contractual, no mandamus can be issued in such matters. There is no justifiable reason to invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court in view of the decision in Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. Uma Devi & Anr. AIR 2006 SC 1806, the appointments were made only under temporary scheme. The scheme was introduced for providing additional benefit to 21 students in rural areas for this particular Session 2008-09. The petitioners had no right to invoke writ jurisdiction to extend it. It was introduced to provide additional educational facility in remote villages and to fill up the temporary gap and that too, on contractual basis for the fixed term and on fixed honorarium. In Rajasthan Educational Service Rules, 1971 and in Rajasthan Educational Subordinate Service Rules, 1971, complete procedure has been provided for recruitment through the Rajasthan Public Service Commission. During pendency of the matters, now power has been conferred to Zila Parishad as submitted by Shri R.L. Jangid, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the State. The appointments were not made as per rules. The scheme was framed to provide better and more teaching facility to the students temporarily. The Single Bench in Sarita Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) has issued following directions in para 36 of the decision. In para 36 thus- “36. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of as under:- I. During continuation of the work, as detailed out hereinabove, the invocation of the last extension is arbitrary and illegal; and the consequential automatic termination orders of the petitioners are set aside. II. The RPSC/DPC selected candidates/employees are still not available and next academic session is about to start; even urgent temporary appointments under Rule 28 of the Rules of 1971 are not possible due to short span of one month and a half left to start with the process of admission and academic session, therefore, as per the aims and objects of the Scheme, respondents are directed to consider the cases of the petitioners for continuation in service till regularly sleected candidates from RPSC/persons selected and recommended by the DPC for promotion are made available in the light of the above observations; III.Even in case of appropriate order of continuation in service till regularly selected candidates from RPSC/DPC selected persons are available, the petitioners are not 22 entitled for wages of the vacations in other words, when the schools are closed. IV.In case the regularly selected candidates from RPSC/persons selected and recommended by the DPC for promotion are made available, then the respondents can terminate services of the petitioners after preparation of the seniority list on the State Level as per their date of appointment and merit assigned to them, by following the principle of 'last come first go' to the extent of availability of the selected candidates and while doing so, the respondents will keep the interest of the present students and prospective students in view.” The Single Bench at Jodhpur while deciding the matters in question has followed the decision rendered in Sarita Vs. State of Raj. (supra). It has been ordered that in the interest of education of students as the posts have not been filled in so far on regular basis, it is desirable to continue the Vidhyarthi Mitras till regular selections on the various posts is made in accordance with rules. Aggrieved by the decision rendered, the instant intra-court appeals have been preferred. Shri R.L. Jangid, learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the State has submitted that the scheme itself was temporary and appointments were contractual, consequently, no mandamus could have been issued to continue the candidates, the contract came to an end by efflux of time. Shri Jangid further submitted that selection process was supposed to be completed by RPSC as there was delay on part of the RPSC in starting the process of regular selection. The State Government has taken a decision now to delegate the power of appointments of teachers in such schools to the District Establishment Committee of Zila Parishad. Thus, efforts are being made to appoint the regular incumbents, no command could have been issued to continue incumbents who were not regularly selected. Mr. Jangid has further submitted that in light of the decision of Apex Court in 23 Secretary, State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi (supra), the directions issued to continue such employees in service was not warranted. Shri Ramesh Purohit, Shri R.S. Chundawat, Shri Sumer Singh Rathore, Dr. S.S. Jodha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents have supported the order passed by the Single Bench rendered in Sarita Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) and have submitted that the ad hoc employees cannot be substituted by another set of ad hoc employees nor the contractual employee can be substituted by another set of contractual employees appointed on ad hoc basis. Every year, fresh selection cannot be permitted to be made as done under the Scheme for each academic session. Making of selections every year cannot be said to be conducive in the interest of education and it gives rise to several complaints. Selecting persons every year on ad hoc basis is per se arbitrary and removing them on coming to end of the academic sessions, then starting the procedure afresh, is not conducive even for good administration or for education. Thus a direction issued to continue Vidhyarthi Mitras till regularly selection is made, calls for no interference in these intra-court appeals. It is not in dispute that there are large number of vacancies of teachers in various categories in the State as mentioned by the Single Bench. There are 6000 vacancies which were to be filled by promotions of Lecturers, 5000 posts of Senior Teachers were vacant and 1250 posts of Teacher Grade III were vacant. Thus, the State Government has taken a decision in the year 2006 introducing a Scheme as pointed out by Shri R.L. Jangid, learned Additional Advocate General. The Scheme indicates that due to inability to fill the vacancies by regular mode of selection through RPSC or by holding DPC, in the interest of education, the decision was taken to start Vidhyarthi Mitra Yojana and no doubt the 24 appointments were offered on contractual basis and on fixed honorarium. It was decided that 5066 posts were to be filled in. The said incumbents appointed as against the post of Lecturers will be paid the honorarium of Rs.4,000/-. There were 8990 vacancies of Senior Teachers. The incumbents appointed as against the post of Senior Teachers will be paid the honorarium of Rs.3,000/- per month. Thereafter the Scheme has continued on yearwise basis and every year fresh process of appointments used to be resorted to. It is apparent that in case Vidhyarthi Mitras are removed, no regularly selected persons are available to replace them. The stand taken by the State of Rajasthan in these appeals itself indicates that the object behind it to provide basic minimum educational facility in remote villages and to fill-up the temporary gaps. The said temporary gap has not yet been filled in so far and educational facility has not been provided by teachers appointed on regular basis. The ad hocism is being continued by making contractual appointment on yearwise basis on fixed honorarium. It is not in dispute that appointments have been made so as to provide the educational facility in the remote and far flung areas where the required regular teachers are still not available and whatever the facility is available, is in the form of Vidhyarthi Mitras. In our opinion, the appointments which have been made are not as per rules and they have no right to continue in service also or to stake their claim for regularisation. However, though such incumbents have no right to continue in the service but at the same time, the State cannot be permitted to take resort to making fresh recruitments every academic session to fill up the temporary gap which is being stretched. It is desirable that temporary gap should have been filled in by the State by taking appropriate action to make the regular appointments but same 25 has not been done so far and still the vacancies exist at various places. The ad hocism cannot be said to be conducive to the interest of education itself. Incumbents obtaining education in the far flung and remote areas are also entitled to obtain similar education as imparted in the metropolitans but not only that, the schools are not comparable, regular teachers are not available but at the same time, the Vidhyarthi Mitras who are teaching on ad hoc basis in such remote and far flung areas are replaced by fresh ad hoc employees in the next academic session. Making selection every year is not conducive for administration or in the interest of education, it tantamounts to wastage of time and energy for no good reason. The Vidhyarthi Mitras who had served in the previous academic session ought to have been continued in consonance with the spirit of Article 14 of the Constitution till temporary gap is filled. We are surprised that temporary gap has a tendency of becoming permanent one, this situation should not prevail. Mr. Jangid has rightly submitted that it is a fit case where the State may be directed to fill up the temporary gap as early as possible. The Single Bench in Sarita Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) has discussed the matter in detail. Relying upon the decision of State of Haryana and Ors. Vs. Piara Singh & Ors. (1992) 4 SCC 118 = AIR 1992 SC 2130, in which the Apex Court has laid down thus- “45. The normal rule, is regular recruitment through the prescribed agency but exigencies of administration may sometimes call for an ad hoc or temporary appointment to be made. In such a situation, effort should always be to replace such an ad hoc/temporary employee by a regularly selected employee as early as possible. Such a temporary employee may also compete along with other for such regular selection/appointment. If he gets selected, well and good, but if he does not, he must give way to the regularly selected candidate. The appointment of the regularly selected candidate cannot be withheld or keep in abeyance for the sake of such an ad hoc/temporary employee. 26

46. Secondly, an ad hoc or temporary employee should not be replaced by another ad hoc or temporary employee; he must be replaced only by a regularly selected employee. This is necessary to avoid arbitrary action on the part of the appointing authority.” The Apex Court has clearly laid down in the aforesaid decision that the appointment of the regularly selected candidate cannot be withheld or kept in abeyance for the sake of such an ad hoc/temporary employee. The Apex Court has also held that an ad hoc or temporary employee should not be replaced by another ad hoc or temporary employee; he must be replaced only by a regularly selected employee. This is necessary to avoid arbitrary action on the part of the appointing authority. In the decisions rendered in State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Supreet Rajpal & another (2007) 13 SCC 290 and in Hargurpratap Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2007) 13 SCC 292, the Apex Court has laid down that one ad hoc arrangement cannot be substituted by another ad hoc arrangement which is not at all appropriate as the persons who have gained experience will be more beneficial and useful to the colleges concerned rather than to appoint persons afresh on ad hoc basis. The order passed by the High Court was set aside and order was issued to continue the employee till regular incumbents are appointed. In State of Punjab & Ors. Vs. Supreet Rajpal & anr. (supra), the Apex Court has laid down thus- “5. Learned counsel for the appellants, during the course of hearing, had referred to an order passed by this Court in a group of several Civil Appeals, i.e. Civil Appeal No.8745 of 2003 and other appeals, in the case of Harguru Pratap Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors. Etc. disposed of on 7.11.2003. Particular stress was laid on the following observations: We have carefully looking into the judgment of the High Court and other pleadings that have been put forth before this Court. It is clear that though the appellants 27 may not be entitled to regular appointment as such it cannot be said that they will not be entitled to the minimum of the pay scale nor that they should not be continued till regular incumbents are appointed. The course adopted by the High Court is to displace one ad hoc arrangement by another ad hoc arrangement which is not at all appropriate for these persons who have gained experience which will be more beneficial and useful to the colleges concerned rather than to appoint persons afresh on ad hoc basis. Therefore, we set aside the order made by the High Court to the extent the same deny the claim of the appellants of minimum pay scale and continuation in service till regular incumbents are appointed. We directed that they shall be continued in service till regular appointments are made on minimum of the pay scale. The appeals shall stand allowed in part accordingly.” In Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. Umadevi & Ors. (supra), the Apex Court has held that such appointments cannot be regularised. However, the instant is not the case of regularisation but the question involved is of appointing incumbents for short term on ad hoc basis. The Apex Court in Uma Devi has set aside part of the decision of Piara Singh wherein regularization of such incumbents was ordered but not the part of decision in which it has been laid down that ad hoc employee should not be replaced by another set of ad hoc employee. Rule of 'last come first go' is based on Article 14 which also indicates that person who has been appointed in last has to be removed. The spirit of Article 14 is that even the ad hoc employees are entitled for fair treatment, they cannot be removed unnecessarily. Respondents Vidhyarthi Mitras have been appointed in the interest of students obtaining education in remote and far flung areas and other places, where regular recruitments have not been made by the State Government. In our considered opinion, the action which has been taken for appointing ad hoc teachers on academic session basis and thereafter removing them and substituting them by another set of ad hoc employees, is not in consonance with the Article 14. Thus, we find that 28 direction has been issued to continue these employees till regular selection is made. It has been held that they are not entitled for the salary of vacation period when education is not imparted. In our opinion, the decision which has been rendered, has been unnecessarily assailed by the State in these intra-court appeals. It is in their interest to continue these experienced incumbents and to replace them as early as possible by regularly selected candidates. The Single Bench has rightly placed implicit reliance in Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors. Vs. Anil Kumar Singh & Ors. (2003) 10 SCC 284 in which direction was issued by the Apex Court to continue the contractual employees till the posts are filled up by process of regular recruitment. The Single Bench has also placed reliance in Official Liquidator Vs. Dayanand & Ors. (2008) 10 SCC 1 in which the Apex Court has laid down thus- “32. In Official Liquidator Vs. Dayanand and others (2008) 10 SCC 1, the judgment in State of Haryana Vs. Piara Singh (supra) was considered in paras 18,43,46 and 48 but in the said judgment, the issue was relating to the regulations and absorption, therefore, no finding was given on the issue of replacing ad hoc employee by another ad hoc employee. The other findings have been referred in the aforesaid paras more particularly para 72 regarding inconsistency of Piara Singh (supra) of para 45 and 50 but not para 46 and held that scheme of regularisation/absorption can only be in accordance with the said Constitution Bench judgment in State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi (3).” Since, it has not been possible to fill the vacancies so far by appointing the persons on regular basis by the regular mode of selection prescribed under the rules or by holding the Departmental Promotion Committee, we are of the opinion that no case is made out so as to interfere in the decision rendered. However, Shri R.L. Jangid, learned Additional Advocate General has submitted that direction No.4 provides that the State Level seniority list has to be prepared and on that basis, 29 the rule of 'last come first go' has resorted to. It is submitted by the learned Additional Advocate General that for such incumbents, State Level seniority list is not maintained. It is not disputed by the counsel appearing for the respondents that the seniority list may be prepared at the Level on which the seniority of such incumbents is maintained under the rules and thereafter rule of 'last come first go' has to be applied. Accordingly, we modify the direction No.4 to the aforesaid extent. Though, we have not interfered in the order but it is desirable that ad hocism which is continuing, be stopped forthwith by way of appointing regularly selected incumbents either by promotion or by direct recruitment, as may be necessary. Let, the exercise be done for regular appointments as prayed by Shri R.L. Jangid, as early as possible, to say, within a period of six months. Accordingly, the intra-court appeals stands disposed of. No costs. [KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI],J. [ARUN MISHRA], CJ. Praveen