✦ Rajasthan High Court · 16 Sep 2008

Mr.Ramit Mehta, for & Anr. v. Smt. Parvati Devi has not yet been decided and same is at & Anr.

VINEET KOTHARI

Case at a glance

Decided
16 Sep 2008
Bench
VINEET KOTHARI

Outcome

Disposed of

this revision petition is disposed of with direction to the Assistant

Judgment

Operative part

Mr.Ramit Mehta, for the petitioner. Mr.Arjun Singh for the respondent no.3. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 15/6/2006, whereby, the learned trial court rejected the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC of the defendant petitioner and held that suit under Section 22 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 was maintainable. This Court vide order dated 26/7/2007 vacating the interim stay directed the learned trial court of the Assistant Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Udaipur to decide the pending suit expeditiously. On 15/9/2008, this Court granted time to Mr. Arjun Singh, learned counsel for the Devasthan Department to ascertain the status of the suit itself. Learned counsel informed the court that said suit no.182/2006 – Mandir (Murti Shree) Abhyeshwarnath & Anr. vs. Smt. Parvati Devi and Anr. has not yet been decided and same is at the stage of evidence. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order dated 15/6/2006 and - 2 - this revision petition is disposed of with direction to the Assistant Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Udaipur to decide the aforesaid suit under Section 22 of the Act expeditiously not later than six months from today. With these observations, this revision petition is disposed of. (DR.VINEET KOTHARI), J. item no.35 baweja/-

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: this revision petition is disposed of with direction to the Assistant

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 7 r. 11; Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 — s. 22.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Rajasthan High Court, on 16 Sep 2008. The bench was VINEET KOTHARI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Rajasthan High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments