Parsadia v. State of Rajasthan
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The revision petition stands disposed of as above
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 380, 394, 457
Judgment
Operative part
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SARRAF Mr.P.N.Mohnani, for the petitioner. Mr.S.N.Tiwari, Public Prosecutor for the State. This is a revision petition against the judgment of Additional Sessions Judge, Bhilwara dated 12.5.1993 whereby the appeal of the petitioner against the judgment of Additional Munsif and Judicial Magistrate No.1, Bhilwara was partly accepted and instead of Sections 457 and 394 IPC, he was convicted u/s 457 and 380 IPC and under each of the two sections, he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for six months and a fine of Rs.100/- and in default of payment of the fine, he was further sentenced to 15 days simple imprisonment. Mr.P.N.Mohnani, learned counsel for the petitioner does not challenge the judgment of the first appellate court on merits but he submits that the incident is of 30.6.1976 and no purpose will be served by sending the petitioner back in jail now at this stage. He, therefore, prays that a lenient view be taken in the matter. Learned P.P. has supported the judgment of the first appellate court. The incident is of 30.6.1976 and the petitioner has undergone a prolonged trial. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, this revision petition is partly allowed. The conviction of the petitioner under Sections 457, 380 is upheld but the sentence passed against him is set aside and the petitioner is sentenced to imprisonment for a period already undergone by him. The revision petition stands disposed of as above. (G.S.SARRAF),J.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The revision petition stands disposed of as above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 380, 394, 457.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 03 Jan 2007. The bench was G S SARRAF.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.