CRM-M-69424 v. STATE OF HARYANA

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Jasvinder Rao, Advocate Present: Mr. Jasvinder Rao, for the petitioners. for the petitioners. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Vikram Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Mr. Manjeet Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2. for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, 1) and registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P-1) and registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of subsequent proceedings arising compromise deed therefrom on the basis of compromise deed and affidavit dated dated 04.11.2025 (Annexure P-2 and P 2 and P-3).

2. This Court vide order dated 10.12.2025 This Court vide order dated had directed the parties 10.12.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded ed Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness ed Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness ed Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. of the compromise. GURPREET 2026.02.28 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-69424 69424-2025 2

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sonepat and got their statements recorded. On and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate the basis of the stat First Class, ements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sonepat has submitted report dated has submitted report dated 19.12.2025 to the effect that the 19.12.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. any coercion or undue influence.

4. well as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 well as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.

5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.

6. rinciples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment rinciples laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the p Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under , this petition is allowed and FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under FIR No.334, dated 16.10.2025, under Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, Sections 316(2), 318(4) BNS, 2023 and Section 24 of Emigration Act, 1983, 1) and registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P-1) and registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P registered at Police Station Bahalgarh, District Sonipat (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of subsequent proceedings arising th compromise deed erefrom on the basis of compromise deed and affidavit dated dated 04.11.2025 (Annexure P-2 and P 2 and P-3) are quashed.

7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. of, accordingly.

26.02.2026 Gurpreet Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No GURPREET 2026.02.28 11:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE