PARKASH SINGH @ PARKASH CHAND @ MADDI v. STATE OF PUNJAB
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 28 Jan 2026
- Bench
- MANDEEP PANNU
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Mr. Puneet Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)
The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.70, dated
12.06.2025, under Sections 21, 61, 85 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Sadar Ahmedgarh, District Malerkotla.
This Court vide order dated 01.12.2025 while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 01.12.2025 the petitioner has joined the investigation.
Learned State counsel has filed a status report by way of an affidavit of Sukhdev Singh Brar, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Ahmedgarh, District Malerkotla, on behalf of the respondent-State. The same is taken on record. On instructions from ASI Harjinder Singh, ANU 2026.01.28 16:30 I am the author of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-67006-2025 -2- learned State counsel does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required.
In view of the above, the order dated 01.12.2025 is made absolute.
Operative part
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
28.01.2026 Anu (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : : Whether reportable Yes/No Yes/No ANU 2026.01.28 16:30 I am the author of this document Chandigarh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 — ss. 21, 61, 85.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 28 Jan 2026. The bench was MANDEEP PANNU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.