✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 08 Jul 2026

STATE OF PUNJAB & Ors. v. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl., AG, Punjab

Cwp No. 34357 of 2025ACTING CHIEF, ROHIT KAPOOR2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition stands disposed of accordingly

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. Petition stands disposed of accordingly. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also CWP-34357-2025 (O&M) 3 stand disposed of. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE JULY 08, 2026 Rahul Joshi

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Mr. Mukul Singla, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl., AG, Punjab. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J. (Oral) CM-8068-CWP-2026 (preponement)

1.

This application under Section 151 CPC has been filed on behalf of the applicant-petitioner seeking preponement of the date of hearing fixed in the main writ petition.

2.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The date already fixed in the main writ petition is preponed to today. Main Case (O&M)

3.

With the consent of all the parties, main writ petition is taken on board for hearing.

4.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of Notification No.9/2023-Central Tax dated 31.03.2023 (Annexure P-7), Notification No.56/2023-Central Tax dated 28.12.2023 (Annexure P-9), CWP-34357-2025 (O&M) 2 Notification No.71/P.A.5/2017/S. 168A/2023 dated 23.08.2023 (Annexure P-8) as also for quashing of order dated 07.07.2025(Annexure P-13) and order dated 09.04.2024 (Annexure P-11), as the same have been passed without affording an opportunity of personal hearing. Relief has, however, been confined to the final orders on the ground that they are passed without affording any opportunity of personal hearing, therefore, the impugned action of the respondent(s) amounts to a violation of principles of natural justice.

5.

Learned State counsel, who has appeared on advance notice does not dispute the factual aspects that opportunity of personal hearing was not afforded to the petitioner. Learned State counsel, therefore, states that the matter can be conveniently remitted back to the concerned authority, for conducting the proceedings afresh in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

6.

In view of the fair stand taken by the respondents, this matter is remitted back to the authority concerned, and the impugned orders dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure P-13) and 09.04.2024 (Annexure P-11) are set aside. The respondents shall proceed afresh in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. It is further provided that no coercive action henceforth shall be taken in the matter and any recovery already made shall abide by the fresh orders to be passed in accordance with law.

Operative part

8.

Petition stands disposed of accordingly. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also CWP-34357-2025 (O&M) 3 stand disposed of. [ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA] ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE [ROHIT KAPOOR] JUDGE JULY 08, 2026 Rahul Joshi

1. Whether Speaking/reasoned 2. Whether Reportable Yes/No Yes/No

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition stands disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 151.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 08 Jul 2026. The bench was ACTING CHIEF, ROHIT KAPOOR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Cwp No. 34357 of 2025). ← Search more judgments