MANISH KUMAR ALIAS MUNISH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. Gourav Verma, Mr. Gourav Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. S.S. Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. S.S. Goripuria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 7. for respondent Nos.2 to 7. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) RUPINDERJIT

1. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik This is a petition filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Kaithal (Annexure P-1) along with the charge sheet (Annexure P Kaithal (Annexu 2) and 1) along with the charge sheet (Annexure P-2) and compromise deed subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 09.10.2025

09.10.2025 (Annexure P-3).

2. This Court vide order dated 04.11.2025 This Court vide order dated had directed the parties 04.11.2025 had directed the parties a/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded a/Duty Magistrate to get their statements recorded to appear before the Illaq and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. of the compromise. GURPREET 2026.02.27 20:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-61841 61841-2025 2

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kaithal and got their statements recorded. On and got their statements recorded. On Judicial Magistrate First Class, the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate First Class, the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate Kaithal has has submitted report dated 19.02.2026 to the effect that the 19.02.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and witho compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and witho any coercion or undue influence. any coercion or undue influence.

4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 to Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 7 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.

5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to eedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proc

6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble reme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 reme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 reme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under , this petition is allowed and FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under FIR No.47, dated 05.04.2017, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Kaithal (Annexure P-1) along with the charge sheet (Annexure P Kaithal (Annexure P 2) and e charge sheet (Annexure P-2) and compromise deed subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of dated 09.10.2025 ) are quashed. 09.10.2025 (Annexure P-3) are quashed.

7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. of, accordingly.

23.02.2026 Gurpreet GURPREET 2026.02.27 20:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No CHAHAL) (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE