MAHINDER SHAH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Nikhil Batta, Advocate for the petitioner(s) (through VC). Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) As the petitioner is an accused in one other case under the NDPS Act, the counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, at this stage. Ordered accordingly.
13.12.2024 Kusum (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KUSUM 2024.12.13 14:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, CHD
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 13 Dec 2024. The bench was JASJIT SINGH BEDI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.