✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 18 May 2026

HARJINDER SINGH ALIAS JINDER AND OTHERS v. PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M No. 59005 of 2025RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL5 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

petition is allowed and FIR No

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose…
  • Para 66. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others…
  • Para 77. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. of, accordingly.

Judgment

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. S.K. Rai, for the petitioners. Mr. S.K. Rai, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Shruti, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms. Shruti, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms. Shruti, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1.

Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 FIR No.64, dated for quashing of FIR No.64, dated

20.04.2017, under Sections 336, 324, 34 IPC, registered at PS Ajnala, District 20.04.2017, under Sections 336, 324, 34 IPC, registered at PS Ajnala, District 20.04.2017, under Sections 336, 324, 34 IPC, registered at PS Ajnala, District 20.04.2017, under Sections 336, 324, 34 IPC, registered at PS Ajnala, District Amritsar (Rural), (Annexure P-1) and subsequent proc Amritsar (Rural), (Annexure P eedings arising subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P-2).

2.

This Court vide orders dated This , 12.12.2025 and dated 17.10.2025, 12.12.2025 and had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty 28.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty recorded and the learned Magistrate was Magistrate to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was recorded and the learned Magistrate was Magistrate to get their statements directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise.

3.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ajnala, and got their statements recorded. and got their statements recorded. Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Ajnala, Sub Divisional Judicial On the basis of the statements so recorded, Sub Divisional Judicial On the basis of the statements so recorded, On the basis of the statements so recorded, GURPREET 2026.05.19 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-59005 59005-2025 (O&M) 2 Magistrate, Ajnala, has submitted report dated Magistrate, Ajnala, to the effect that has submitted report dated 14.05.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. any coercion or undue influence.

4.

Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.

5.

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the inst continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the inst

Operative part

6.

Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and , this others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this FIR No.64, dated 20.04.2017, under Sections 336, petition is allowed and FIR No.64, dated 20.04.2017, under Sections 336, FIR No.64, dated 20.04.2017, under Sections 336, petition is allowed and - 324, 34 IPC, registered at PS Ajnala, District Amritsar (Rural), (Annexure P 324, 34 IPC, registered at PS Ajnala, District Amritsar (Rural), (Annexure P- 324, 34 IPC, registered at PS Ajnala, District Amritsar (Rural), (Annexure P compromise subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of are quashed. dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P-2) are quashed. dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P

7.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. of, accordingly.

18.05.2026 Gurpreet (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No GURPREET 2026.05.19 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is allowed and FIR No

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 324, 336.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 18 May 2026. The bench was RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 59005 of 2025). ← Search more judgments