UMAR BANSAL CONTRACTOR v. GGARWAL & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate Present: Mr. for the petitioner. for th Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. D.A.G., Harya Mr. A , Haryana. HARKESH MAN **** MANUJA, J. (Oral)
#1. By way of present petition filed By w filed under Sections 10 & 12 of th of the Contempt of Cou of Courts Act, 1971, contempt proce proceedings are sought to be initiate initiated against the respo respondents towards alleged willf willful disobedience of order date r dated
04.09.2023 passed passed by this Court in CWP No.1957 19575 of 2023.
#2. Learned counsel for the petitioner Lear ioner submits that the order qua whic the contempt pr proceedings have been sought ught, stands complied with, thereb thereby releasing the princ e principal amount, therefore, he seeks e seeks to withdraw the present petitio petition, however, with lib ith liberty to avail appropriate remed remedy as per law to claim interest o erest on the delayed paym payment.
#4. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesa Dism aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. Rule August 29, 202 Atik , 2024 (HARKESH MANUJA) (HA JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whe Whether reportable Whe Yes/No Yes/N Yes/No Yes/N MOHMED ATIK 2024.08.30 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.