✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 08 Apr 2026

RAVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. 13139 of 2026MANDEEP PANNU

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The present petition is disposed of accordingly

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. The present petition is disposed of accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

Judgment

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Navmohit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mr. Sushil Kumar Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J.(Oral) CRM No.13139 of 2026 This is an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C/528 BNSS seeking restoration of main case, which had been dismissed for non- prosecution by this Court vide the order dated 11.03.2026. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main petition is ordered to be restored to its original number. CRM-M No.63891 of 2023

2.

Heard on the petition. The only prayer made by the petitioner in the present petition is to expedite the trial which is pending since 2019. The case is still pending for the prosecution evidence. NEETU RANI 2026.04.08 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD CRM-M No.63891 of 2023 -2-

3.

Keeping in view the pendency of the trial since 2019 and also keeping in view the fact that out of 20 prosecution witnesses, only 06 witnesses have been examined, direction is issued to the trial Court to expedite the trial.

Operative part

5.

The present petition is disposed of accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

08.04.2026 (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Yes/No Whether Reportable: NEETU RANI 2026.04.08 18:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment PHHC, CHD

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The present petition is disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 08 Apr 2026. The bench was MANDEEP PANNU.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM No. 13139 of 2026). ← Search more judgments