I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI v. K.A.P Sinha & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 s. 12
- Constitution of India art. 215
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same is disposed off. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
Judgment
Present : Mr. Shalender Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vishnav Gandhi, DAG Punjab. Mr. H.S. Oberoi, Advocate for respondent No.2. AL K A SARI N, J. (Or al)
This is a petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with under Article 215 of the Constitution of India for initiation of proceedings against the respondents for violation of order dated 01.04.2025 passed in CWP-9216-2025.
A short reply by way of an affidavit of respondent No.2 has been filed by learned counsel for respondent No.2, which is taken on record. Registry to scan the same and tag at the appropriate place. As per the reply, the order dated 01.04.2025 passed in CWP-9216-2025 has since been complied with and letter dated 18.06.2025 (Annexure P-7) has been issued to the District Treasury Officer, Sangrur for revising the family pension of the petitioner as per 5th and 6th Punjab Pay Commission. JITENDER KUMAR 2025.10.31 09:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh COCP-4955-2025 -4-
In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same is disposed off. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
30.10.2025 ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2025.10.31 09:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — s. 12; Constitution of India — art. 215.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 30 Oct 2025. The bench was K A SARI N.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.