MANMEET SINGH & Ors. v. STATE OF PUNJAB & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 323
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-61688-2023 Date of Decision: April 10, 2024 MANMEET SINGH AND ORS ........Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Hardik Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Raghav Taneja, Advocate for respondent No.2. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) **** By way of the present petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, prayer has been made for quashing of case bearing GD No.33 dated
30.08.2022 registered under Sections 323 of IPC at P.S. Kathu Nangal, District Amritsar (Rural) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 14.10.2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach this Court again, in case any fresh settlement is arrived at between the parties.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty subject to Rs.2,500/- to be deposited with High Court Clerks’ Bar Association, Chandigarh.
10.04.2024 Tejwinder Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2024.04.10 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 323.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 10 Apr 2024. The bench was HARKESH MANUJA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.