✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 18 Sep 2025

The High Court · 2025

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- None. None. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The petitioners namely Taniya and Sachin The petitioners namely Taniya and Sachin have approached this 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of Court under Article their lives and personal liberty from private respondents No.6 to 11. their lives and personal liberty from private respondents No their lives and personal liberty from private respondents No It is averred from the petition that both It is averred from the petition that both the petitioners are major, aged 25 years and they have performed marriage years and 25 years respectively and they have performed marriage In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar against the wishes of their parents. In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar against the wishes of their parents. Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The marriage of the Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The marriage of the Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 16.09.2025 at Maa Naina Devi An petitioners was solemnized on Maa Naina Devi An Kalyan Sanstha (Regd.), Sector-4, Panchkula, as per Hindu Sanstha (Regd.), Sector Hindu rites and rituals. A copy of has also been appended. The petitioners Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-3) has also been appended. The petitioners Marriage Certificate (Annexure apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of them apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a constant danger of cated in a false case. being implicated in a false case. averred from It is averred from It is the petition the petition that representations dated that representations

16.09.2025 (Annexure P

09.2025 (Annexure P-5 and P-6) have also been submitted by also been submitted by the petitioners to the respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, to the respondent No.2 Superintendent of Police, District Jalandhar and Senior Superintendent of Police, District Jalandhar (Rural) respondent No.3- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Jalandhar (Rural) respondent No.3 and they confine their prayer that the representation may be examined. they confine their prayer that the representation may be examined. SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.18 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 134 CRWP-101 10165-2025(O&M) 2 , the present petition is being disposed of In view of the above, the present petition is being disposed of In view of the above ithout examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and ithout examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon with a direction to expressing any opinion thereon to the respondent No.4- Station House Officer, Police Station Police Station Rama Mandi, District Jalandhar Rama Mandi, District Jalandhar to look into the ioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in grievances of the petit representations dated dated 16.09.2025 (Annexure P-5 and P and P-6) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. n case any criminal case has been/is However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is However, it is clarified that i nothing in this order shall be construed as a registered against the petitioners, nothing in this order shall be construed as a registered against the petitioners bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. accordance with law. a copy of this order along with The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with The Registry is directed to send copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No copy of the petition and above said representation to respondent No.4- Station House Officer, Police Station Rama Mandi, District Jalandhar for requisite Police Station Rama Mandi, District Jalandhar compliance.

18.09.2025 Sumit Gusain (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.09.18 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 18 Sep 2025. The bench was VINOD S BHARDWAJ.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments