Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners is allowed and the order dated 16.09.2025 granting interim bail to them, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions…
Judgment
Learned State counsel on instructions affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioners and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioners are not required for further custodial interrogation.
In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners is allowed and the order dated 16.09.2025 granting interim bail to them, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. (now 482(2) of BNSS, 2023)
However, it is made clear that if the petitioners fail to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to them. (cid:3) (cid:18)$%&’(& (cid:10)(cid:7))(cid:31)(cid:10)(cid:6)(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:3) 0$& %/ (cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:27)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:18)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:25)(cid:29)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:2)(cid:30)(cid:29) (cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:10)(cid:24)(cid:25)(cid:29)#(cid:22) B/ (cid:31)/ ,(cid:3)%5 (cid:30)<$&. B/ (cid:31)/ ,(cid:3), 5!,(cid:31)(cid:30)4* ’ ’ (cid:18) %?(cid:2)! (cid:18) %?(cid:2)! DINESH 2025.11.18 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.