✦ High Court of India

Jagwant Singh and Others Jagwant Singh and Others v. Singh and Another Avtar Singh and Another

Case Details

(O&M) CR-6659-2025 (O&M) -1- - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH -.- CR CR-6659-2025 (O&M) Decided on :- 19.09.2025 Decided on : Jagwant Singh and Others Jagwant Singh and Others ....Petitioners VERSUS Singh and Another Avtar Singh and Another ....Respondent

Legal Reasoning

MANDEEP PANNU CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU CORAM : HON'BLE M Mr. V.G.Jauhar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. V.G.Jauhar, Advocate for the petitioners Present: Mr. V.G.Jauhar, Advocate for the petitioners MANDEEP PANNU J. MANDEEP PANNU -.- 1. The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioners The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioners The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioners The present civil revision petition has been filed by the petitioners to set aside the orders dated 11.07.2025, 24.07.2025, 01.08.2025 and seeking to set aside the orders dated 11.07.2025, 24.07.2025, 01.08.2025 and to set aside the orders dated 11.07.2025, 24.07.2025, 01.08.2025 and to set aside the orders dated 11.07.2025, 24.07.2025, 01.08.2025 and 13.08.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bathinda, whereby 13.08.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bathinda, whereby 13.08.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bathinda, whereby 13.08.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bathinda, whereby the matter has been repeatedly adjourned for arguments on the stay application. the matter has been repeatedly adjourned for arguments on the stay application. the matter has been repeatedly adjourned for arguments on the stay application. 2. the petitioners submits that the stay application Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the stay application the petitioners submits that the stay application Learned counsel for already stood decided by the trial Court on 25.04.2022, yet despite this, the trial already stood decided by the trial Court on 25.04.2022, yet despite this, the trial already stood decided by the trial Court on 25.04.2022, yet despite this, the trial already stood decided by the trial Court on 25.04.2022, yet despite this, the trial Court has continued to adjourn the case for arguments on the same application, Court has continued to adjourn the case for arguments on the same application, Court has continued to adjourn the case for arguments on the same application, Court has continued to adjourn the case for arguments on the same application, roceedings. which has caused unnecessary delay in the proceedings. which has caused unnecessary delay in the p 3. I have considered the contention raised. The grievance of the I have considered the contention raised. The grievance of the I have considered the contention raised. The grievance of the I have considered the contention raised. The grievance of the petitioners is essentially with regard to the manner in which the proceedings are petitioners is essentially with regard to the manner in which the proceedings are petitioners is essentially with regard to the manner in which the proceedings are petitioners is essentially with regard to the manner in which the proceedings are being adjourned by the trial Court. This is a matter which can be effectively being adjourned by the trial Court. This is a matter which can be effectively being adjourned by the trial Court. This is a matter which can be effectively being adjourned by the trial Court. This is a matter which can be effectively ice of the trial Court itself. If such a request or assertion is made brought to the notice of the trial Court itself. If such a request or assertion is made ice of the trial Court itself. If such a request or assertion is made brought to the not before the trial Court, it shall consider the same on its own merits and proceed with before the trial Court, it shall consider the same on its own merits and proceed with before the trial Court, it shall consider the same on its own merits and proceed with before the trial Court, it shall consider the same on its own merits and proceed with the case accordingly without adjourning it further on that ground. the case accordingly without adjourning it further on that ground. the case accordingly without adjourning it further on that ground. TRIPTI SAINI 2025.09.19 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (O&M) CR-6659-2025 (O&M) -2- - 4. nd is made out for interference in In view of the above, no ground is made out for interference in nd is made out for interference in In view of the above, no grou exercise of revisional jurisdiction at this stage. The petitioners are at liberty to raise exercise of revisional jurisdiction at this stage. The petitioners are at liberty to raise exercise of revisional jurisdiction at this stage. The petitioners are at liberty to raise exercise of revisional jurisdiction at this stage. The petitioners are at liberty to raise the said contention before the trial Court, and upon such request being made, the the said contention before the trial Court, and upon such request being made, the the said contention before the trial Court, and upon such request being made, the the said contention before the trial Court, and upon such request being made, the n accordance with law and the record trial Court shall take an appropriate decision in accordance with law and the record n accordance with law and the record trial Court shall take an appropriate decision i of the case. 5. 6.

Decision

The present civil revision petition is disposed of in the above terms The present civil revision petition is disposed of in the above terms The present civil revision petition is disposed of in the above terms Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 2025 September 19, 2025 tripti Whether speaking/non Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable Whether reportable (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE TRIPTI SAINI 2025.09.19 13:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

This is the original judgment text as indexed from the source corpus. Always verify against the official court record before relying on it in a filing — you can do so on eCourts or the Supreme Court of India website. ← Search more judgments