12.2024 Date o Jitender Sain er Saini @ Jitender v. State of Punj f Punjab & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 03 Dec 2024
- Bench
- NIDHI GUPTA
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 376, 386
Judgment
M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Dr. Sumati Jund, Advocate for t te for the petitioner cing). (through Video Conferencing). Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Pu G, Punjab NIDHI GUP I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya N tiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 .C., 2023 (earlier Section 482 Cr.P.C., 1973) is for is for issuance of directions to respon respondent N0. 2 for producing the petitioner in in the Court of Learned Additiona dge, ditional Sessions Judge-cum-Judge, FTSC, SAS , SAS Nagar, Mohali, so as to ens to ensure his presence during the framing of c g of charge in case FIR No. 99 date 1) 9 dated 24.11.2023 (Annexure P-1) registered u red under Sections 323, 386, 376, IPC 376, 384, 506, 493 and 511 IPC (Sections 49 ons 493 and 511 IPC deleted later o en, later on) at Police Station Women, District SAS t SAS Nagar, Punjab. On the last date of hearing i.e. ng i.e.
14.10.2024, following order was passed b assed by this Court:- “It is the contention petitioner/accused that FIR registered on 24.11.2023 under 506, 493 and 511 IPC (Sectio later on) at Police Station Wo on of learned counsel for the IR No.99 (Annexure P-1) was nder Sections 323, 386, 376, 384, 4, ections 493 and 511 IPC deleted Women, District SAS Nagar and RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.05 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-503 50318-2024 - -2- the challan was presented on 1 the petitioner was taken into cu Learned counsel for the orders (Annexures P-8 to P-17) to submit that perusal thereof s date the petitioner has not been trial Court by respondent No New District Jail Nabha. It is Production Warrants of accus learned and every date by petitioner/accused has not been trial Court. h, on 14.3.2024. Pursuant to which, o custody on 16.12.2023. the petitioner refers to the zimni 24 17) from 13.5.2024 till 21.9.2024 eof shows that on each and every been produced before the learned n, t No.2-Superintendent of Prison, It is also pointed out that though ccused have been issued on each been produced before the learned trial Court, yet Learned counsel for the S necessary instructions in this re Adjourned to 22.11.2024 the State seeks some time to get is regard.
024.” Learned counsel for the State o tate on instructions from HC Harjit Singh has i has informed that the petitioner ha ner has been produced before the learned trial d trial Court on 30.10.2024; and char d charges have been framed by the learned trial d trial Court in his presence; thereafte ereafter, the petitioner has also been produced be ced before the learned trial Court on urt on 18.11.2024, as well; and the next date of ate of hearing is 10.12.2024. Learned counsel for the petition etitioner fairly admits the aforesaid submissions ssions of learned counsel for the State w of State; and submits that in view of the same, th the instant petition has been rend y be rendered infructuous and may be disposed of a of as such. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s any, shall also stand disposed of. 2024
03.12.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2024.12.05 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 376, 386.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 03 Dec 2024. The bench was NIDHI GUPTA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.