SUMIT v. STATE OF HARYANA & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Given above, the present pe(cid:5)(cid:5)on stands disposed of having been rendered infructuous. All pending miscellaneous applica(cid:5)ons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) JUDGE
Judgment
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present None for the pe(cid:5)(cid:5)oner. Mr. Shiva Khurmi, D.A.G., Haryana **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL)
The present pe(cid:5)(cid:5)on has been filed under Ar(cid:5)cle 226 of the Cons(cid:5)tu(cid:5)on of India read with Sec(cid:5)ons 3 (1) (b) (c) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 for the grant of emergency parole for 04 weeks as the wife of the pe(cid:5)(cid:5)oner is pregnant and the doctor has given the date of delivery of child as 20.08.2025.
State counsel submits that the pe(cid:5)(cid:5)oner sought parole to take care of his wife during her pre-natal and post-natal period. Since the pe(cid:5)(cid:5)oner's wife had already delivered a baby on 19.08.2025, the present pe(cid:5)(cid:5)on has become infructuous.
Given above, the present pe(cid:5)(cid:5)on stands disposed of having been rendered infructuous. All pending miscellaneous applica(cid:5)ons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) JUDGE
20.07.2026 Jyo(cid:9)-II Whether speaking/non-speaking: Whether reportable: Speaking No.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 20 Jul 2026. The bench was ANOOP CHITKARA, RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.