Date of decision v. State of Ha
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI E NIDHI GUPTA Present:- vocate Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG , DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GU HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present petitio petition is for issuance of an appropriate opriate writ, order or direction, par n, particularly in the nature of Certiorari, orari, for quashing Clause 17(iv) 17(iv) of the Instructions for Candidates idates issued by respondent No.2 (An .2 (Annexure P-4), to the extent it restricts the icts the eligibility of a scribe to a stude a student studying up to the 10+2 level, being , being arbitrary, unreasonable, discrim discriminatory and ultra vires the provisions isions of the Rights of Persons wi ns with Disabilities Act, 2016, besides bei es being violative of Articles 14, 16 an , 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, in th , in the interest of justice and equity equity; and/or for issuance of an appropriate opriate writ, order or direction, par n, particularly in the nature of Mandamus damus, directing the respondents to co s to consider and decide the legal notice date e dated 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) b 5) by passing a reasoned and VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.14 20.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-25405-2026 (O & M) 2 speaking o king order and to permit the petitione etitioner to avail the facility of a scribe in ac e in accordance with the provisions of ons of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities bilities Act, 2016, the Government o ent of India Office Memoranda dated 29.0
29.08.2018 and 10.08.2022, and t and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Su ’ble Supreme Court of India. After arguing for some time, time, when this Court was not inclined to ned to interfere in the matter, learned earned counsel for the petitioner prays for w s for withdrawal of the present petition tition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, if any, shall stand disposed of. August 13 Vijay Asija 3, 2026 Whether spea Whether Repo r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.14 20.37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.