Amit Sharma & Anr. v. Authorized Officer Union Bank of India & Anr.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
This petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Vishav Bharti Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Vishav Bharti Gupta, Advocate, Present : Mr. Vishav Bharti Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. for the petitioners. (Through video conferencing) (Through video Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate, for the respondent for the respondent-Bank. *** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw th Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw th petition as the matter has been settled. petition as the matter has been settled. withdrawn. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn. This petition is dismissed as (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE JUDGE September 26 vandana 6, 2024 ther speaking/reasoned : Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Whether reportable Yes/No Yes/No VANDANA 2024.09.26 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This petition is dismissed as withdrawn
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 26 Sep 2024. The bench was ANUPINDE, ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, LAPITA BANERJI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.