✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 25 Jan 2024

CRM-M No. 51051 of 2023 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2024

CRM-M No. 51051 of 2023MANISHA BATRA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 09

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. In view of the said facts, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 09.10.2023 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the…

Judgment

Present:- Mr. Rahul Soi, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, DAG, Punjab. ***** MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1.

Through the instant petition under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioners seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.104 dated

10.08.2023, registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 354, 148 and 149 of IPC at Police Station Amargarh, District Malerkotla.

2.

Vide order dated 09.10.2023, the petitioners have been directed to join the investigation.

3.

Learned State counsel on instructions received from Investigating Officer states that the petitioners have since joined the investigation and they are not required for custodial interrogation.

Operative part

4.

In view of the said facts, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 09.10.2023 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. January 25, 2024 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Yes/No Yes/No (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE HIMANSHU 2024.01.25 19:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 09

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 438, 438(2); Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 148, 149, 323, 341, 342, 354.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 25 Jan 2024. The bench was MANISHA BATRA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 51051 of 2023). ← Search more judgments