Rsa No. 560 of 2015 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 23 r. 3
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. H.S.Batth, Advocate, for respondent No.1. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) CM-2108-C-2025 Prayer made in the application filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151, CPC, is for disposing of the appeal in terms of compromise dated
29.01.2025, Annexure A-1, executed between the parties. Counsel for the appellant states that during the pendency of the second appeal, a settlement has been arrived at between the parties and a written compromise, Annexure A-1, has been executed. Issue notice of the application. Mr. H.S.Batth, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of contesting respondent No.1. He has affirmed the factum of compromise between the parties. He does not have any objection in case the appeal is disposed off in terms of compromise, Annexure A-1. For the reasons given in the application, it is allowed. PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.02.28 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Annexure A-1 is taken on record. RSA-560-2015 (O&M) -2- RSA-560-2015 (O&M)
In view of settlement arrived at between the parties, appeal is disposed off. Decree be modified in terms of compromise, Annexure A-1.
Pending application is also disposed off. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE
25.02.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Whether Reportable Yes/No Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.02.28 09:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 23 r. 3.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 25 Feb 2025. The bench was SUVIR SEHGAL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.