Mr. A.K. Maurya v. R.K. Chaudhary
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 23 Apr 2026
- Bench
- HARPREET SINGH BRAR
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India arts. 14, 21, 32, 226, 227
Judgment
The present petition is filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to release the service/retiral benefits of the petitioner, who retired on 31.07.2011 from the post of Field Inspector (Junior) under the Haryana State Co-operative Supply and Marketing PARUL VERMA 2026.05.08 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:5)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:5)(cid:10) (cid:21) Federation Limited (hereinafter ‘HAFED’). It is further prayed that the respondents be directed to grant the benefit of regularization in service from a back date in terms of Agenda No. 375/52 (Annexure P-5) dated
24.01.2023, as approved by the Board of Administration, HAFED. Further, a direction is sought for release of interest on the amount, as reflected in the payable balance charge-sheet of the petitioner dated 18.08.2023(Annexure P-9), from the date it became due till the date of its actual release. (cid:8)(cid:9)(cid:2)(cid:4)(cid:6)(cid:2)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:9)(cid:2)(cid:27)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — arts. 14, 21, 32, 226, 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 23 Apr 2026. The bench was HARPREET SINGH BRAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.