Cwp No. 23285 of 2024 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2024
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- SARFAESI Act, 2002 s. 14
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Heard. Heard. In view of the limited prayer of the petitioner, this petition is In view of the limited prayer of the petitioner, this petition is In view of the limited prayer of the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to…
Judgment
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDE CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Mr. Nitin Thatai Advocate, for the petitioner. for the petitioner. Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. *** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral The petitioner-Company is seeking directions to respondent No. The petitioner is seeking directions to respondent No.2 to execute the order dated the order dated 20.06.2022 (Annexure P (Annexure P-5) passed by learned District Magistrate, under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for Magistrate, Rohtak under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for handing over the physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner- handing over the physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner handing over the physical possession of the secured asset to the petitioner Company.
#3. Issue notice to the respondents. Issue notice to the respondents. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Anant At the asking of the Court, Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana, and 2. accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1
#5. Heard. Heard. In view of the limited prayer of the petitioner, this petition is In view of the limited prayer of the petitioner, this petition is In view of the limited prayer of the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 disposed of wit h a direction to respondent No.2-Tehsildar-cum-Executive Magistrate, District Rohtak, to ensure that the order passed by District Rohtak, Haryana, to ensure that the order passed by VANDANA 2024.09.12 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2024 (O&M) CWP-23285-2024 (O&M) learned District District Magistrate, Rohtak on 20.06.2022
20.06.2022 (Annexure P-5) is executed expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. receipt of certified copy of this order. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE JUDGE September 12, 2024 September 12 vandana (LAPITA BANERJI) (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE JUDGE ther speaking/reasoned : Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Whether reportable Yes/No Yes/No VANDANA 2024.09.12 17:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
SARFAESI Act, 2002 — s. 14.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 12 Sep 2024. The bench was ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, ANUPINDE, LAPITA BANERJI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.