November 27 v. Appellan pellant
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Dismissed as withdrawn. Dism Pending application(s), if any, shall also Pendi all also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 of of 1 , 2024 November 27, 202 mahavir Whether speaking/rea ing/reasoned: table: Whether reportable: MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.12.04…
Judgment
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR CORAM: HON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MEENAK HON HIR SINGH ENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present:- Appe Appellant in person with Mr. Ravinav Chawla, Advocate for the Mr. for the appellant. Respondent in person with Respo Mr. M.K. Singla, Advocate for the resp Mr. he respondent. ***** SUDHIR SINGH NGH, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel for b At th for both the sides submit that durin during pendency of the ap the appeal, a compromise has been ef een effected between the parties befor before learned Family Co ily Court. As per terms of the said c said compromise, a balance amount o ount of Rs.2,00,000/-, in th , in the shape of a cheque bearing No.3 g No.322482 dated 06.11.2024 has bee as been handed over, in co , in course of hearing, by learned coun d counsel for the respondent to learne learned counsel for the app he appellant, for its further transmissio smission to the appellant. A copy thereo thereof has also been ten en tendered and the same is taken o ken on record and marked as ‘X’ fo ‘X’ for reference. Learned earned counsel for the appellant thus, thus, seeks permission to withdraw th raw the appeal.
#3. Dismissed as withdrawn. Dism Pending application(s), if any, shall also Pendi all also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 of of 1 , 2024 November 27, 202 mahavir Whether speaking/rea ing/reasoned: table: Whether reportable: MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.12.04 12:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.