Judgment · High Court · 2024
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 1212. Decree sheet be drawn accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE November 13, 2024 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.12.09 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/…
Judgment
CORAM: HON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT S HON HIR SINGH JIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Mr. Akshay Chadha, Advocate for the or the appellant. Resp Respondent/ wife present in person w Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate. Mr. rson with SUDHIR SINGH INGH, J. (ORAL) ***** Learned counsel for the parties are ad Lear n the ad idem that the matter between the parties has been se een settled amicably. In this regard, the d an rd, the respondent-wife has tendered an affidavit dated 13 ted 13.11.2024 containing the terms of s of settlement, the contents whereof are not disputed b uted by the counsel for the appellant-hus husband. The said affidavit is taken on record and has d has been marked as ‘X’ for the purpos urpose of reference.
#2. Though the parties are required to file Thou g the to file an application for converting the present appeal int eal into a petition under Section 13-B o 1955 B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘the Act he Act’), yet as the matter stands settled, rties, ettled, on the oral request of the parties, we convert the pre the present appeal into the petition under under Section 13-B of the Act.
#3. Vide judgment and decree dated 27. Vide 27.09.2017 passed by the learned Additional Distric District Judge, Ludhiana, the petition Act filed under Section 13 of the Act filed by the appel appellant/husband seeking dissolution o , ution of marriage between the parties, was dismissed. MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.12.09 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 3 FAO-M-325-2017 (O&M)
#4. Learned counsel for the parties submit that marriage between the parties was solemnized on 22.01.2012 according to Sikh rites ceremonies and out of the said wedlock, no child was born.
#5. Learned counsels further submit that the parties have been living separately for more than 12 years. Learned counsel for the parties further submit that the respondent has tendered an affidavit dated 13.11.2024, and the contents thereof are acceptable to the appellant. Both the parties have decided to part ways. The relevant of terms and conditions as contained in the aforesaid affidavit arrived at between the parties, would read as under:- “1.
#4. include present That the deponent is respondent in the abovementioned matter. On 13.11.2024 appellant and deponent have agreed to seek divorce by way of mutual consent wherein appellant has agreed to pay a total sum of Rs.20 lacs towards full and final settlement future past, maintenance/alimony. That deponent was awarded maintenance to the tune of Rs.9,000/- by the Court of Ld. Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ludhiana and Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana under the provisions of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 vide orders dated 03.08.2016 and 11.01.2018. Arrears the said proceedings. The present amount of Rs.20,00,000/- shall include the above referred arrears as well. That deponent further undertakes to not to file any execution application qua the above mentioned orders dated 03.08.2016 and 11.01.2018 and deponent shall have no objection in case if any order passed in the above referred proceedings is kept in abeyance in perpetuity subject to payment of full and final settlement amount of Rs.20,00,000/- by the appellant. That deponent undertakes to not to file any other litigation against appellant subject to payment of full and final settlement amount as mentioned above.” tune of Rs.11,00,000/- are pending
#6. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the aforesaid amount of Rs.20,00,000/- agreed as full and final settlement, which includes past, present and future maintenance/alimony, would be deposited in the shape of a Demand Draft in favour of the respondent/wife, with the Registry of this Court, within a period of 20 days.
#7. Learned counsel for the respondent also submits that the respondent shall not file any execution application qua the orders dated 03.08.2016 and MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.12.09 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment FAO-M-325-2017 (O&M)
11.01.2018 passed under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short ‘DV Act’), as stated the aforesaid settlement/affidavit.
#8. In view of the settlement (as indicated in the affidavit) between the parties, the present petition under Section 13-B of the Act is allowed. Since the divorce is being granted to the parties by way of mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Act, it goes without saying that the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2017, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana shall have no effect, and the same stands set aside.
#9. The respondent/wife shall submit an undertaking regarding non-filing of any execution petition qua the orders dated 03.08.2016 and 11.01.2018 passed under the DV Act. Upon filing of such undertaking, the Registry shall release the amount of Rs.20,00,000/- in favour of the respondent/wife.
#10. However, it is clarified that the parties shall also remain bound by the terms and conditions of the aforesaid settlement/ compromise, which shall form part of the decree.
#12. Decree sheet be drawn accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE November 13, 2024 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.12.09 14:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 13 Nov 2024. The bench was SUDHIR SINGH, JASJIT SINGH BEDI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.