Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2024
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Malkiat Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Kashav Chadha, Advocate for respondent No.2. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C is for quashing FIR No.89 dated 08.07.2016 under Sections 406,420,120-B IPC and Section 13 of Punjab Travel Professional Regulation Act, 2014 registered at P.S Division No.4, District Jalandhar (City). Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant has gone abroad and thus he seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to the parties move fresh petition as and when formalities are completed qua compromise. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. ( SANDEEP MOUDGIL ) JUDGE
23.10.2024 MANOJ KUMAR 2024.10.25 03:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
Whether speaking/ reasoned : :
Whether reportable Yes /No Yes /No
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 482; Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 23 Oct 2024. The bench was SANDEEP MOUDGIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.