PARAMJEET ALIAS JYOTI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Present: Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Armaan Dahiya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Nitish Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. Nitish Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. Nitish Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik This is a petition filed under Section This is a petition filed under Section Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quashing of Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 FIR No.137, dated for quashing of FIR No.137, dated

01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at subsequent Police Station Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P-1) and subsequent Police Station Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P Police Station Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of proceedings arising therefrom

01.07.2025 on the basis of compromise dated 01.07.2025 2). (Annexure P-2).

2. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated The

24.07.2025 Court vide order dated 24.07.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get was directed to send its their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate report qua the genuineness of the compromise. report qua the genuineness of the compromise. report qua the genuineness of the compromise. GURPREET 2026.05.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-39278 39278-2025 2

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the and got their statements recorded. On the Civil Judge Senior Division, Jhajjar and got their statements recorded. On the and got their statements recorded. On the Civil Judge Senior Division, Jhajjar basis of the statements so recorded, Civil Judge Senior Division, Jhajjar basis of the statements so recorde Civil Judge Senior Division, Jhajjar has to the effect that the compromise has been submitted report dated 15.04.2026 to the effect that the compromise has been to the effect that the compromise has been submitted report dated effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence.

4. .2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 Learned State counsel as well as counsel for Learned State counsel as well as counsel for have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.

5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.

6. down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment down by the Full Bench judgment Following the principles laid Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.137, dated 01.05.2025, under , this petition is allowed and FIR No.137, dated 01.05.2025, under FIR No.137, dated 01.05.2025, under Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Sections 115, 126, 190, 191(2), 351(3) BNS, registered at Police Station Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P-1) and Sadar Jhajjar, District Jhajjar (Annexure P subsequent proceedings 1) and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise arising therefrom on the basis of - se dated 01.07.2025 (Annexure P- are quashed. 2) are quashed.

7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of, accordingly. of, accordingly.

29.04.2026 Gurpreet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE GURPREET 2026.05.01 17:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.