Gurpal Sin al Singh tioner v. State of Ha of Haryana and others ndents
Case Details
1 330 CR CRM-M-38024-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN IN AT CHANDIG F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRM-M-38024-202 Decided on : 04.11.202 2025 11.2025 Gurpal Sin al Singh tioner . . . Petitioner ersus Versus State of Ha of Haryana and others ndents . . . Respondents CORAM: AM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S ICE SANJAY VASHISTH PRESENT vocate SENT: Mr. Vishal Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Vinay Malhotra, DAG, H AG, Haryana. Mr. S. S. Bhullar, Advocate w Mr. G. S. Bhangu, Advocate, **** cate with ocate, for the respondent-complainan lainant. SANJAY V JAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer in this petition, filed u BNSS, filed under Section 482 of the BNSS 2023 (earli (earlier Section 438 Cr.P.C.), is for is for grant of anticipatory bail to th il to the petitioner, ioner, who has been booked in a cr
Legal Reasoning
n a criminal case arising out of Fir of First Information rmation Report, as detailed here-unde under:- o of e Name tioner Petitioner (s) FIR No. Date on(s) Section(s) (cid:13) (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:8) (cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:4)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13) (cid:13)(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:13)(cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:13)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:19) (cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:13) (cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:14)(cid:10)(cid:8)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13) Gurpal Singh age h aged 50 5 ut about years Police Station istrict District (cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:24)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:13)(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:20)(cid:29) (cid:20)(cid:29)(cid:20) 2. On 21.08.2025, this Court, pa urt, passed the following order:- ANIL KUMAR 2025.11.06 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CR CRM-M-38024-2025 1. Prayer in this petition, filed filed under Section 482 of the BNS BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 438 438 Cr.P.C.), is for grant nt of anticipatory bail to the petiti etitioner, who has been booked in d in a criminal case arising out o ut of First Information Report, a rt, as detailed hereunder:- Name of Petitioner (s) Gurpal Singh aged about 50 years Date FIR No. Section(s) Police Station Distric istrict (cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3) (cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:4)(cid:7)(cid:4)(cid:8) (cid:4)(cid:8) (cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:9)(cid:10)(cid:4)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13) (cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:14)(cid:10)(cid:8)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13) (cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:6)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13) (cid:9)(cid:6)(cid:13) (cid:15)(cid:16)(cid:13)(cid:17)(cid:18)(cid:19) (cid:18)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:23)(cid:20)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:13)(cid:26)(cid:27)(cid:28)(cid:20) (cid:28)(cid:20)(cid:29)(cid:20) 2.
Legal Reasoning
Learned counsel for th or the petitioner, inter alia, contend ntends that as per the allegations, pe s, petitioner had received an amou mount of Rs.2 lacs in cash from the the complainant, namely, Rahul, fo ul, for sending his younger brother S her Sahil, abroad. 3. Without delving into t to the merits of the case, learne arned counsel for the petitioner sub submits that the monetary dispute ute in question has been amicably bly resolved between the petition itioner and the complainant throug rough mutual settlement. Moreove eover, petitioner is ready to joi join the investigation and ful fully cooperate, if protected from a om arrest by this Court. Thus, pra prays for grant of concession of ant f anticipatory bail to the petitioner ner in the present case. 4. Notice of motion. 5. On advance notice, M AAG, , Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG Haryana, puts in appearanc rance on behalf of the responde ndent State, and Mr. S.S. Bhullar, A ar, Advocate, puts in appearance o ce on behalf of respondent Nos.2 an .2 and 3. ANIL KUMAR 2025.11.06 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3 CR CRM-M-38024-2025 However, to prevent lo nt loss to the State Exchequer, th r, the appearance of the concerned rned respondent(s) in the subseque equent proceedings will only be rec recognized, if the requisite proce rocess fee is deposited by the petiti petitioner(s), within a period of on of one week from today. 6. Counsel for respondent N nt Nos.2 and 3 submits that in fac n fact, monetary dispute between een the petitioner and responde ndent Nos.2 and 3 has already bee been resolved amicably, and he ha he has no objection, if the petitione tioner is granted the concession ion of anticipatory bail in the presen resent case. 7. After hearing the submissio issions addressed by counsel for th for the respective parties, this Court ourt directs the petitioner to join th in the investigation within two w o weeks from today, and in th n the eventuality of the arrest, pe t, petitioner would be released o ed on anticipatory bail, subject to t to his furnishing bail bonds to th to the satisfaction of the Arresting O ing Officer. The petitioner shall als ll also be abide by all the conditions tions laid down under Section 482( 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Sectio ection 438(2) Cr.P.C.). 8. Besides, it is directed ted that petitioner would hand ov d over his passport to the Inves nvestigating Agency or to Cou Court concerned, if he possesses. sses. Otherwise, would submit a it an affidavit, disclosing the fact fact that he does not possess an s any passport. It is also directed that that before leaving country any tim y time during trial, petitioner woul would seek prior permission of th of the Court. ANIL KUMAR 2025.11.06 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 4 3. CR CRM-M-38024-2025 25. 9. List again on 04.11.2025. 10. Counsel for respondent N ent Nos.2 and 3 is directed to file a file an affidavit, confirming the com compromise that has taken plac place between the petitioner and the d the answering respondents.” Reply by way of affidavit fidavit of Deputy Superintendent o dent of Police, Na e, Naraingarh, District Ambala, ha , has been filed by learned Sta d State counsel. T sel. The same is taken on record. rd. 4. Continuing his submissions, l ions, learned counsel for the petitione etitioner contends th ends that in compliance of the order d order dated 21.08.2025, passed by th by this Court, peti rt, petitioner has joined the investiga vestigation, and has fully co-operate perated. Therefore, efore, he prays for confirmation of t n of the said interim anticipatory ba ory bail order. 5. Learned State counsel on l on instructions, confirms the sai he said averment ment made by learned counsel for sel for the petitioner of joining th ing the investigatio stigation on 30.08.2025, by the petitio of now, petitioner, and submits that as of now custodial in dial interrogation of the petitioner is oner is not required for the purpose o rpose of investigatio stigation. 6. 7. Heard learned counsel for the for the parties. Since, petitioner has alread already joined the investigation an ion and custodial i dial interrogation is no more requir required; ad-interim bail order date er dated 21.08.2025 8.2025, passed by this Court is here s hereby made absolute. Accordingl rdingly, present pet ent petition is allowed. ANIL KUMAR 2025.11.06 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 5 CR CRM-M-38024-2025 However, petitioner shall con all continue to join the investigation a ation as and when r when required to do so and abide by de by all the terms and conditions lai ons laid down unde n under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 202 S, 2023. 8. Accordingly, petition stands d
Decision
tands disposed of. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE ember 04, 2025 November anil Whether s Whether R er speaking/reasoned: Yes/No /No Yes/No er Reportable: ANIL KUMAR 2025.11.06 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document